PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4GLD.DE vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

4GLD.DE vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

4GLD.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 4GLD.DE achieves a -2.63% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 22.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with 4GLD.DE having a 12.28% annualized return and SCHD not far ahead at 12.56%.


4GLD.DE

1D
2.93%
1M
-9.07%
YTD
-2.63%
6M
-0.59%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
18.62%
10Y*
12.28%

SCHD

1D
0.97%
1M
4.68%
YTD
22.52%
6M
21.34%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

4GLD.DE vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
-2.63%49.32%34.57%9.33%7.12%4.03%13.03%21.27%3.19%-1.67%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
22.52%-8.04%19.03%1.41%2.74%39.59%5.55%30.17%-1.13%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between 4GLD.DE and SCHD is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

4GLD.DE vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4GLD.DE
4GLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4GLD.DE vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


4GLD.DESCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.41

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

6.38

-5.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

15.88

-12.46

4GLD.DE vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 4GLD.DE and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

4GLD.DE vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4GLD.DE and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


4GLD.DESCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.79%

-32.28%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.73%

-4.15%

-17.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.73%

-21.40%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.73%

-21.40%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.73%

-32.28%

+10.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.44%

0.00%

-19.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.03%

-4.42%

-7.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.11%

1.67%

+5.44%

Volatility

4GLD.DE vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.90%. This indicates that 4GLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


4GLD.DESCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

2.90%

+4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.81%

8.45%

+12.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.70%

11.52%

+12.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

14.59%

+1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.56%

17.43%

-2.87%

4GLD.DE vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

4GLD.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

4GLD.DE vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

4GLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.22%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


4GLD.DE and SCHD have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHD.

4GLD.DE is categorized as Gold, while SCHD is Dividend. 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Börse Commodities and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for 4GLD.DE and 0.06% for SCHD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 4GLD.DE and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer