PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4GLD.DE vs. GBSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

4GLD.DE vs. GBSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) and WisdomTree Physical Gold EUR Daily Hedged (GBSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 4GLD.DE achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than GBSE.DE's 0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, 4GLD.DE has outperformed GBSE.DE with an annualized return of 13.36%, while GBSE.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.16% annualized return.


4GLD.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
2.80%
6M
6.42%
1Y
30.27%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
19.85%
10Y*
13.36%

GBSE.DE

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
0.31%
6M
4.63%
1Y
28.73%
3Y*
28.22%
5Y*
15.61%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

4GLD.DE vs. GBSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
2.80%49.32%34.57%9.32%7.12%4.03%13.05%21.25%3.20%-1.67%
GBSE.DE
WisdomTree Physical Gold EUR Daily Hedged
0.31%62.87%24.14%10.15%-2.06%-5.63%21.48%13.15%-5.56%8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between 4GLD.DE and GBSE.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2013

0.79

The correlation between 4GLD.DE and GBSE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

4GLD.DE vs. GBSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4GLD.DE
4GLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

GBSE.DE
GBSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GBSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GBSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4GLD.DE vs. GBSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) and WisdomTree Physical Gold EUR Daily Hedged (GBSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


4GLD.DEGBSE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.22

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.63

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

4.08

+0.54

4GLD.DE vs. GBSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the GBSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 4GLD.DE and GBSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


4GLD.DEGBSE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.16

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

0.90

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.65

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.31

+0.33

Drawdowns

4GLD.DE vs. GBSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, roughly equal to the maximum GBSE.DE drawdown of -38.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4GLD.DE and GBSE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


4GLD.DEGBSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.79%

-38.38%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.54%

-17.55%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

-17.55%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

-22.71%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.23%

-24.45%

+6.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.95%

-16.18%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-18.88%

+7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.52%

7.02%

-0.50%

Volatility

4GLD.DE vs. GBSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) is 5.09%, while WisdomTree Physical Gold EUR Daily Hedged (GBSE.DE) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that 4GLD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


4GLD.DEGBSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

5.93%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.09%

21.62%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.06%

24.64%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

17.12%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.37%

15.50%

-1.13%

4GLD.DE vs. GBSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

4GLD.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GBSE.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

4GLD.DE vs. GBSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 4GLD.DE nor GBSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, 4GLD.DE and GBSE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GBSE.DE.

4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price, while GBSE.DE tracks MS Long Gold Euro Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Börse Commodities and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for 4GLD.DE and 0.12% for GBSE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 4GLD.DE and GBSE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer