PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4GLD.DE vs. 8PSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

4GLD.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) and Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 4GLD.DE achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than 8PSE.DE's 0.15% return.


4GLD.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
2.80%
6M
6.42%
1Y
30.27%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
19.85%
10Y*
13.36%

8PSE.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
0.15%
6M
4.45%
1Y
28.47%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
15.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

4GLD.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
2.80%49.32%34.57%9.32%7.12%4.03%-3.52%
8PSE.DE
Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC
0.15%62.78%24.11%10.00%-2.18%-5.81%2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between 4GLD.DE and 8PSE.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2020

0.84

The correlation between 4GLD.DE and 8PSE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

4GLD.DE vs. 8PSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4GLD.DE
4GLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

8PSE.DE
8PSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
8PSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4GLD.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) and Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


4GLD.DE8PSE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.60

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

0.56

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

2.31

+2.31

4GLD.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the 8PSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 4GLD.DE and 8PSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


4GLD.DE8PSE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

0.16

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

0.17

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.16

+0.48

Drawdowns

4GLD.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, smaller than the maximum 8PSE.DE drawdown of -50.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4GLD.DE and 8PSE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


4GLD.DE8PSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.79%

-50.81%

+14.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.54%

-50.81%

+34.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

-50.81%

+34.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

-50.81%

+34.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.95%

-16.31%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-10.13%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.52%

12.27%

-5.75%

Volatility

4GLD.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) is 5.09%, while Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that 4GLD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 8PSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


4GLD.DE8PSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

5.95%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.09%

71.01%

-50.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.06%

181.73%

-158.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

87.63%

-71.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.37%

81.06%

-66.69%

4GLD.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

4GLD.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than 8PSE.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

4GLD.DE vs. 8PSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 4GLD.DE nor 8PSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


4GLD.DE and 8PSE.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for 8PSE.DE.

4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price, while 8PSE.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price PM (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Börse Commodities and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for 4GLD.DE and 0.34% for 8PSE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 4GLD.DE and 8PSE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer