PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4BRZ.DE vs. AMEL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

4BRZ.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (DE) USD (Acc) (4BRZ.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

4BRZ.DE is traded in USD, while AMEL.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AMEL.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 4BRZ.DE having a 10.78% return and AMEL.DE slightly higher at 10.88%.


4BRZ.DE

1D
1.19%
1M
1.17%
6M
9.79%
YTD
10.78%
1Y
25.26%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
5.24%
10Y*

AMEL.DE

1D
0.47%
1M
0.51%
6M
11.15%
YTD
10.88%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
7.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

4BRZ.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
4BRZ.DE
iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (DE) USD (Acc)
10.78%48.47%-29.92%32.87%14.05%-19.58%-19.46%28.48%-1.96%
AMEL.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR
10.88%55.85%-26.65%32.20%9.92%-10.88%-13.56%18.15%-3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between 4BRZ.DE and AMEL.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2018

0.93

The correlation between 4BRZ.DE and AMEL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

4BRZ.DE vs. AMEL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4BRZ.DE
4BRZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
4BRZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4BRZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
4BRZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
4BRZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
4BRZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEL.DE
AMEL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4BRZ.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (DE) USD (Acc) (4BRZ.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


4BRZ.DEAMEL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.25

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.98

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.45

5.38

-1.93

4BRZ.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 4BRZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 4BRZ.DE and AMEL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

4BRZ.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 4BRZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.20%, smaller than the maximum AMEL.DE drawdown of -61.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4BRZ.DE and AMEL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


4BRZ.DEAMEL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.20%

-61.57%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.49%

-15.11%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.79%

-27.01%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.39%

-28.52%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.72%

-11.17%

-4.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

-26.29%

+7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.13%

5.44%

+1.69%

Volatility

4BRZ.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (DE) USD (Acc) (4BRZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) at 6.16%. This indicates that 4BRZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMEL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


4BRZ.DEAMEL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

6.16%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.51%

17.10%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.57%

20.72%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.42%

22.52%

+4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.15%

26.16%

+6.99%

4BRZ.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

4BRZ.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

4BRZ.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 4BRZ.DE nor AMEL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, 4BRZ.DE and AMEL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AMEL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMEL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for 4BRZ.DE.

4BRZ.DE tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for 4BRZ.DE and 0.20% for AMEL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 4BRZ.DE and AMEL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer