PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3XLE.L vs. MAGD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3XLE.L vs. MAGD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) and IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3XLE.L is traded in GBp, while MAGD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MAGD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3XLE.L achieves a 97.09% return, which is significantly higher than MAGD.L's -16.64% return.


3XLE.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
-5.14%
YTD
97.09%
6M
82.88%
1Y
133.33%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
10Y*

MAGD.L

1D
0.97%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-16.64%
6M
-17.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3XLE.L vs. MAGD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between 3XLE.L and MAGD.L is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3XLE.L vs. MAGD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3XLE.L
3XLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
3XLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3XLE.L vs. MAGD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) and IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3XLE.LMAGD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

3XLE.L vs. MAGD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3XLE.LMAGD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

-0.28

+0.62

Drawdowns

3XLE.L vs. MAGD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3XLE.L drawdown since its inception was -74.89%, which is greater than MAGD.L's maximum drawdown of -28.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3XLE.L and MAGD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3XLE.LMAGD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.89%

-28.32%

-46.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.03%

-25.32%

-6.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.06%

-12.20%

-32.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.33%

Volatility

3XLE.L vs. MAGD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3XLE.LMAGD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.92%

22.15%

+44.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.19%

22.15%

+60.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.19%

22.15%

+60.04%

3XLE.L vs. MAGD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3XLE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGD.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

3XLE.L vs. MAGD.L - Dividend Comparison

3XLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.


Frequently Asked Questions


3XLE.L and MAGD.L have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MAGD.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAGD.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3XLE.L.

3XLE.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MAGD.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3XLE.L and 0.45% for MAGD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3XLE.L and MAGD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer