3XLE.L vs. 2FB.L
3XLE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP) and 2FB.L (Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3XLE.L is actively managed, while 2FB.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3XLE.L returned 14.74%/yr vs 38.40%/yr for 2FB.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3XLE.L vs. 2FB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3XLE.L achieves a 97.09% return, which is significantly higher than 2FB.L's -16.41% return.
3XLE.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- 97.09%
- 6M
- 82.88%
- 1Y
- 133.33%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2FB.L
- 1D
- 7.11%
- 1M
- 11.12%
- YTD
- -16.41%
- 6M
- -17.80%
- 1Y
- -28.39%
- 3Y*
- 38.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.08%
- 10Y*
- —
3XLE.L vs. 2FB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3XLE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP | 97.09% | -17.73% | -12.65% | -29.34% | 191.33% | -3.39% |
2FB.L Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP | -16.41% | -8.57% | 128.56% | 597.14% | -92.16% | -1.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3XLE.L and 2FB.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021 | 0.04 |
The correlation between 3XLE.L and 2FB.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3XLE.L vs. 2FB.L — Risk / Return Rank
3XLE.L
2FB.L
3XLE.L vs. 2FB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3XLE.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.97 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | -0.47 | +3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | -0.87 | +10.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3XLE.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | -0.43 | +2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.08 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
3XLE.L vs. 2FB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3XLE.L drawdown since its inception was -74.89%, smaller than the maximum 2FB.L drawdown of -96.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3XLE.L and 2FB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3XLE.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.89% | -96.13% | +21.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.26% | -60.32% | +21.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.05% | -63.66% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -96.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.03% | -49.57% | +17.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.06% | -39.73% | -5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.33% | 32.69% | -18.36% |
Volatility
3XLE.L vs. 2FB.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) has a higher volatility of 25.44% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) at 15.00%. This indicates that 3XLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2FB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3XLE.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.44% | 15.00% | +10.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.73% | 51.06% | +6.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.92% | 66.69% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.19% | 83.82% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.19% | 78.67% | +3.52% |
3XLE.L vs. 2FB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3XLE.L and 2FB.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3XLE.L vs. 2FB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3XLE.L nor 2FB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3XLE.L and 2FB.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3XLE.L and 2FB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
Find the right allocation for 3XLE.L and 2FB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer