3USL.L vs. 3GOO.L
3USL.L (WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB) and 3GOO.L (Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds - 3USL.L tracks the S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index while 3GOO.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 3USL.L returned 19.75%/yr vs 22.13%/yr for 3GOO.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3USL.L vs. 3GOO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3USL.L is traded in USD, while 3GOO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3GOO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3USL.L achieves a 22.59% return, which is significantly lower than 3GOO.L's 32.21% return.
3USL.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- YTD
- 22.59%
- 1Y
- 53.10%
- 3Y*
- 42.60%
- 5Y*
- 19.75%
- 10Y*
- 27.42%
3GOO.L
- 1D
- 14.03%
- 1M
- -2.69%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 32.21%
- 1Y
- 436.54%
- 3Y*
- 94.43%
- 5Y*
- 22.13%
- 10Y*
- —
3USL.L vs. 3GOO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3USL.L WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB | 22.59% | 28.97% | 63.99% | 70.50% | -57.35% | 101.78% | 62.43% |
3GOO.L Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP | 32.21% | 164.65% | 77.33% | 168.31% | -87.32% | 288.64% | 52.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3USL.L and 3GOO.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between 3USL.L and 3GOO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
3USL.L vs. 3GOO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
3USL.L
3GOO.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
3USL.L
3GOO.L
-
Financial Services
3USL.L
3GOO.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
3USL.L
3GOO.L
-
Communication Services
3USL.L
3GOO.L
Healthcare
3USL.L
3GOO.L
-
Industrials
3USL.L
3GOO.L
-
Consumer Defensive
3USL.L
3GOO.L
-
Energy
3USL.L
3GOO.L
-
Utilities
3USL.L
3GOO.L
-
Real Estate
3USL.L
3GOO.L
-
Basic Materials
3USL.L
3GOO.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3USL.L vs. 3GOO.L — Risk / Return Rank
3USL.L
3GOO.L
3USL.L vs. 3GOO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 3USL.L | 3GOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.49 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 8.26 | -6.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | 22.39 | -14.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
3USL.L vs. 3GOO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3USL.L drawdown since its inception was -76.72%, smaller than the maximum 3GOO.L drawdown of -89.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3USL.L and 3GOO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3USL.L | 3GOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.72% | -89.39% | +12.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.29% | -52.44% | +27.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.69% | -68.29% | +19.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.46% | -89.39% | +25.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -25.04% | +21.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -43.94% | +29.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.75% | 19.37% | -12.62% |
Volatility
3USL.L vs. 3GOO.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) is 8.83%, while Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) has a volatility of 26.11%. This indicates that 3USL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3GOO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3USL.L | 3GOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 26.11% | -17.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.74% | 60.81% | -33.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.86% | 89.00% | -53.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.63% | 92.62% | -44.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.40% | 90.38% | -41.98% |
3USL.L vs. 3GOO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3USL.L and 3GOO.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3USL.L vs. 3GOO.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3USL.L nor 3GOO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3USL.L and 3GOO.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3USL.L and 3GOO.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index, while 3GOO.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Leverage Shares.
Find the right allocation for 3USL.L and 3GOO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer