PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3USL.L vs. 2AMD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3USL.L vs. 2AMD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3USL.L is traded in USD, while 2AMD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2AMD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3USL.L achieves a 22.59% return, which is significantly lower than 2AMD.L's 372.79% return.


3USL.L

1D
0.64%
1M
-1.12%
6M
21.60%
YTD
22.59%
1Y
53.10%
3Y*
42.60%
5Y*
19.75%
10Y*
27.42%

2AMD.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
-4.14%
6M
342.35%
YTD
372.79%
1Y
632.24%
3Y*
84.30%
5Y*
40.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3USL.L vs. 2AMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3USL.L
WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB
22.59%28.97%63.99%70.50%-57.35%101.78%62.43%
2AMD.L
Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP
372.79%96.16%-50.71%305.43%-87.71%109.90%156.61%

Correlation

The correlation between 3USL.L and 2AMD.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.58

The correlation between 3USL.L and 2AMD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

3USL.L vs. 2AMD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3USL.L
2AMD.L

Technology

36.9%
100.0%

Financial Services

12.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%

-

Communication Services

10.4%

-

Healthcare

9.0%

-

Industrials

7.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Energy

2.8%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%

-

Technology

3USL.L
36.9%
2AMD.L
100.0%

Financial Services

3USL.L
12.6%
2AMD.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

3USL.L
10.7%
2AMD.L

-

Communication Services

3USL.L
10.4%
2AMD.L

-

Healthcare

3USL.L
9.0%
2AMD.L

-

Industrials

3USL.L
7.4%
2AMD.L

-

Consumer Defensive

3USL.L
4.7%
2AMD.L

-

Energy

3USL.L
2.8%
2AMD.L

-

Utilities

3USL.L
2.3%
2AMD.L

-

Real Estate

3USL.L
1.8%
2AMD.L

-

Basic Materials

3USL.L
1.5%
2AMD.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3USL.L vs. 2AMD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3USL.L
3USL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
3USL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3USL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
3USL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
3USL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
3USL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

2AMD.L
2AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3USL.L vs. 2AMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3USL.L2AMD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.50

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

13.33

-11.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

26.28

-18.43

3USL.L vs. 2AMD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3USL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the 2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3USL.L and 2AMD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3USL.L vs. 2AMD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3USL.L drawdown since its inception was -76.72%, smaller than the maximum 2AMD.L drawdown of -99.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3USL.L and 2AMD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3USL.L2AMD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.72%

-99.46%

+22.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.29%

-54.75%

+29.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.69%

-89.53%

+40.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.46%

-99.46%

+36.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-87.47%

+83.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.68%

-71.13%

+56.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.75%

27.84%

-21.09%

Volatility

3USL.L vs. 2AMD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) is 8.83%, while Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) has a volatility of 45.42%. This indicates that 3USL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2AMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3USL.L2AMD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.83%

45.42%

-36.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.74%

97.76%

-70.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.86%

132.35%

-96.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.63%

4,261.36%

-4,213.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.40%

3,853.17%

-3,804.77%

3USL.L vs. 2AMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3USL.L and 2AMD.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3USL.L vs. 2AMD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3USL.L nor 2AMD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3USL.L and 2AMD.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3USL.L and 2AMD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index, while 2AMD.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 2X AMD Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Leverage Shares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3USL.L and 2AMD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer