PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2AMD.L vs. 3XLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

2AMD.L vs. 3XLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

2AMD.L vs. 3XLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
2AMD.L
Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP
-22.08%82.40%-49.88%285.12%-86.24%7.99%
3XLE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP
157.28%-17.73%-12.65%-29.34%191.33%-3.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2AMD.L achieves a -22.08% return, which is significantly lower than 3XLE.L's 157.28% return.


2AMD.L

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
-22.08%
6M
19.05%
1Y
132.60%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*

3XLE.L

1D
-1.85%
1M
46.81%
YTD
157.28%
6M
154.81%
1Y
71.85%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


2AMD.L vs. 3XLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2AMD.L and 3XLE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

2AMD.L vs. 3XLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2AMD.L
2AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

3XLE.L
3XLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
3XLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2AMD.L vs. 3XLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2AMD.L3XLE.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.05

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

1.57

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.22

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.41

+1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.70

2.25

+2.45

2AMD.L vs. 3XLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the 3XLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2AMD.L and 3XLE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2AMD.L3XLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.05

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.46

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between 2AMD.L and 3XLE.L is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

2AMD.L vs. 3XLE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2AMD.L nor 3XLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

2AMD.L vs. 3XLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2AMD.L drawdown since its inception was -91.38%, which is greater than 3XLE.L's maximum drawdown of -74.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2AMD.L and 3XLE.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


2AMD.L3XLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.38%

-74.89%

-16.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.04%

-51.60%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.56%

-11.27%

-57.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.41%

-45.52%

-9.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.21%

32.36%

-4.15%

Volatility

2AMD.L vs. 3XLE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) has a higher volatility of 24.51% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) at 19.25%. This indicates that 2AMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3XLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


2AMD.L3XLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.51%

19.25%

+5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

92.16%

41.75%

+50.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

116.43%

68.08%

+48.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.54%

81.29%

+19.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.68%

81.29%

+18.39%