PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3SPY.L vs. 3GOE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3SPY.L vs. 3GOE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3SPY.L achieves a 24.05% return, which is significantly lower than 3GOE.L's 37.40% return.


3SPY.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
13.51%
YTD
24.05%
6M
23.76%
1Y
71.75%
3Y*
41.45%
5Y*
10Y*

3GOE.L

1D
10.59%
1M
-15.25%
YTD
37.40%
6M
29.89%
1Y
597.07%
3Y*
85.68%
5Y*
28.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3SPY.L vs. 3GOE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3SPY.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities
24.05%12.38%63.74%58.23%-41.50%
3GOE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs
37.40%133.65%89.16%159.88%-70.00%

Correlation

The correlation between 3SPY.L and 3GOE.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2022

0.56

The correlation between 3SPY.L and 3GOE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3SPY.L vs. 3GOE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3SPY.L
3SPY.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
3SPY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

3GOE.L
3GOE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3SPY.L vs. 3GOE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3SPY.L3GOE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.58

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

11.56

-9.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.54

36.18

-32.64

3SPY.L vs. 3GOE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3SPY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the 3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3SPY.L and 3GOE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3SPY.L3GOE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

6.77

-5.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.59

-0.19

Drawdowns

3SPY.L vs. 3GOE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3SPY.L drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, smaller than the maximum 3GOE.L drawdown of -88.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3SPY.L and 3GOE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3SPY.L3GOE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.70%

-88.62%

+31.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.60%

-51.18%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.70%

-69.84%

+13.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.32%

-22.74%

+15.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.29%

-43.41%

+23.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.20%

16.39%

+3.81%

Volatility

3SPY.L vs. 3GOE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L) is 8.54%, while Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) has a volatility of 24.09%. This indicates that 3SPY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3GOE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3SPY.L3GOE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.54%

24.09%

-15.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.30%

55.21%

-31.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.40%

87.38%

-32.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.91%

89.79%

-37.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.91%

89.29%

-37.38%

3SPY.L vs. 3GOE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3SPY.L has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than 3GOE.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

3SPY.L vs. 3GOE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3SPY.L nor 3GOE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3SPY.L and 3GOE.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3SPY.L is cheaper at 0.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3SPY.L is cheaper with a 0.01% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3GOE.L.

Their fees differ too: 0.01% for 3SPY.L and 0.75% for 3GOE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3SPY.L and 3GOE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer