PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3PLT.L vs. 3GOE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3PLT.L vs. 3GOE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3PLT.L is traded in GBp, while 3GOE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3GOE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3PLT.L achieves a -67.40% return, which is significantly lower than 3GOE.L's 24.70% return.


3PLT.L

1D
-10.34%
1M
-6.09%
YTD
-67.40%
6M
-65.26%
1Y
-49.99%
3Y*
156.05%
5Y*
10Y*

3GOE.L

1D
-8.70%
1M
-19.48%
YTD
24.70%
6M
13.89%
1Y
526.53%
3Y*
78.18%
5Y*
27.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3PLT.L vs. 3GOE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3PLT.L
Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities
-67.40%154.21%2,527.55%363.59%-99.42%-70.37%
3GOE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs
24.70%117.01%92.46%146.89%-84.96%58.98%

Correlation

The correlation between 3PLT.L and 3GOE.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021

0.37

The correlation between 3PLT.L and 3GOE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3PLT.L vs. 3GOE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3PLT.L
3PLT.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

3GOE.L
3GOE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3PLT.L vs. 3GOE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3PLT.L3GOE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.55

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

10.59

-11.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.95

32.88

-33.83

3PLT.L vs. 3GOE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the 3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3PLT.L and 3GOE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3PLT.L3GOE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

6.07

-6.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

0.55

-0.70

Drawdowns

3PLT.L vs. 3GOE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3PLT.L drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than 3GOE.L's maximum drawdown of -87.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3PLT.L and 3GOE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3PLT.L3GOE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.89%

-87.19%

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.49%

-49.28%

-36.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.37%

-70.65%

-15.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.19%

-30.11%

-57.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.65%

-42.11%

-42.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.77%

15.91%

+36.86%

Volatility

3PLT.L vs. 3GOE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) has a higher volatility of 52.34% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) at 21.54%. This indicates that 3PLT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3GOE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3PLT.L3GOE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

52.34%

21.54%

+30.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

109.30%

53.08%

+56.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

150.17%

86.05%

+64.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

193.72%

88.88%

+104.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

193.72%

88.50%

+105.22%

3PLT.L vs. 3GOE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3PLT.L and 3GOE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3PLT.L vs. 3GOE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3PLT.L nor 3GOE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3PLT.L and 3GOE.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3PLT.L and 3GOE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3PLT.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x PLTR Index, while 3GOE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3PLT.L and 3GOE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer