3PLT.L vs. 3CON.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

3PLT.L (Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities) and 3CON.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3PLT.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x PLTR Index while 3CON.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x COIN Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3PLT.L returned -59.94%/yr vs -68.71%/yr for 3CON.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

3PLT.L vs. 3CON.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 3PLT.L having a -87.54% return and 3CON.L slightly lower at -89.50%.

3PLT.L

• 1D: -21.89%
• 1M: -57.79%
• YTD: -87.54%
• 6M: -89.97%
• 1Y: -84.49%
• 3Y*: -59.94%
• 5Y*: -77.85%
• 10Y*: —

3CON.L

• 1D: -17.03%
• 1M: -55.59%
• YTD: -89.50%
• 6M: -90.59%
• 1Y: -98.54%
• 3Y*: -68.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3PLT.L vs. 3CON.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
3PLT.L Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities	-87.54%	154.21%	2,527.55%	-96.32%	-99.26%	1.50%
3CON.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP	-89.50%	-89.33%	-75.96%	1,063.69%	36.77%	0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between 3PLT.L and 3CON.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021	0.47

3PLT.L vs. 3CON.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	3PLT.L	3CON.L
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

3PLT.L vs. 3CON.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3PLT.L

3PLT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4
3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
3PLT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
3PLT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5
3PLT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
3PLT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1

3CON.L

3CON.L Risk / Return Rank: 3
3CON.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
3CON.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
3CON.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2
3CON.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
3CON.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3PLT.L vs. 3CON.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	3PLT.L	3CON.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	-0.50	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.58	-1.60	+1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	0.83	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	-0.99	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	-1.19	-0.30

3PLT.L vs. 3CON.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is comparable to the 3CON.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3PLT.L and 3CON.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

3PLT.L vs. 3CON.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3PLT.L drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum 3CON.L drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3PLT.L and 3CON.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3PLT.L	3CON.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-100.00%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-92.86%	-99.17%	+6.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.78%	-99.86%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-100.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.95%	-99.86%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-93.42%	-80.07%	-13.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	56.91%	83.15%	-26.24%

Volatility

3PLT.L vs. 3CON.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) have volatilities of 55.53% and 56.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3PLT.L	3CON.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	55.53%	56.69%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	116.63%	144.44%	-27.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	151.66%	198.28%	-46.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.11%	1,464,072.91%	-1,463,872.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	199.77%	1,464,072.91%	-1,463,873.14%

3PLT.L vs. 3CON.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3PLT.L and 3CON.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

3PLT.L vs. 3CON.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3PLT.L nor 3CON.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3PLT.L and 3CON.L in my portfolio?

3PLT.L and 3CON.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3PLT.L or 3CON.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3PLT.L or 3CON.L?

3PLT.L and 3CON.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

What is the main difference between 3PLT.L and 3CON.L?

3PLT.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x PLTR Index, while 3CON.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x COIN Index.