3CON.L vs. XS2D.L
3CON.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP) and XS2D.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both Leveraged Equities funds - 3CON.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x COIN Index while XS2D.L tracks the S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3CON.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XS2D.L.
Performance
3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3CON.L is traded in GBp, while XS2D.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XS2D.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3CON.L achieves a -83.52% return, which is significantly lower than XS2D.L's 19.08% return.
3CON.L
- 1D
- -9.89%
- 1M
- -43.03%
- YTD
- -83.52%
- 6M
- -90.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XS2D.L
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 9.89%
- YTD
- 19.08%
- 6M
- 19.26%
- 1Y
- 55.83%
- 3Y*
- 35.20%
- 5Y*
- 21.70%
- 10Y*
- 25.49%
3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
3CON.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP | -83.52% | -22.24% |
XS2D.L Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 19.08% | 2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3CON.L and XS2D.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.42 |
3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
3CON.L
XS2D.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
3CON.L
XS2D.L
Basic Materials
3CON.L
-
XS2D.L
-
Communication Services
3CON.L
-
XS2D.L
Consumer Cyclical
3CON.L
-
XS2D.L
Consumer Defensive
3CON.L
-
XS2D.L
Energy
3CON.L
-
XS2D.L
-
Healthcare
3CON.L
-
XS2D.L
Industrials
3CON.L
-
XS2D.L
Real Estate
3CON.L
-
XS2D.L
Technology
3CON.L
-
XS2D.L
Utilities
3CON.L
-
XS2D.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3CON.L vs. XS2D.L — Risk / Return Rank
3CON.L
XS2D.L
3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3CON.L | XS2D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 0.86 | -1.34 |
Drawdowns
3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3CON.L drawdown since its inception was -91.35%, which is greater than XS2D.L's maximum drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3CON.L and XS2D.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3CON.L | XS2D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.35% | -54.44% | -36.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.35% | -0.85% | -90.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.75% | -8.14% | -58.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.20% | — |
Volatility
3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3CON.L | XS2D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 205.18% | 22.81% | +182.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 205.18% | 30.08% | +175.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 205.18% | 31.29% | +173.89% |
3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3CON.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XS2D.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3CON.L nor XS2D.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3CON.L and XS2D.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XS2D.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XS2D.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3CON.L.
3CON.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x COIN Index, while XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3CON.L and 0.60% for XS2D.L.
Find the right allocation for 3CON.L and XS2D.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer