PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3CON.L vs. XS2D.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3CON.L is traded in GBp, while XS2D.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XS2D.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3CON.L achieves a -83.52% return, which is significantly lower than XS2D.L's 19.08% return.


3CON.L

1D
-9.89%
1M
-43.03%
YTD
-83.52%
6M
-90.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XS2D.L

1D
-0.85%
1M
9.89%
YTD
19.08%
6M
19.26%
1Y
55.83%
3Y*
35.20%
5Y*
21.70%
10Y*
25.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between 3CON.L and XS2D.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025

0.42

3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3CON.L
XS2D.L

Financial Services

100.0%
4.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.6%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

11.8%

Industrials

-

9.3%

Real Estate

-

12.9%

Technology

-

46.5%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

3CON.L
100.0%
XS2D.L
4.1%

Basic Materials

3CON.L

-

XS2D.L

-

Communication Services

3CON.L

-

XS2D.L
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3CON.L

-

XS2D.L
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

3CON.L

-

XS2D.L
0.6%

Energy

3CON.L

-

XS2D.L

-

Healthcare

3CON.L

-

XS2D.L
11.8%

Industrials

3CON.L

-

XS2D.L
9.3%

Real Estate

3CON.L

-

XS2D.L
12.9%

Technology

3CON.L

-

XS2D.L
46.5%

Utilities

3CON.L

-

XS2D.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3CON.L vs. XS2D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3CON.L

XS2D.L
XS2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3CON.LXS2D.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.48

0.86

-1.34

Drawdowns

3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3CON.L drawdown since its inception was -91.35%, which is greater than XS2D.L's maximum drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3CON.L and XS2D.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3CON.LXS2D.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.35%

-54.44%

-36.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.35%

-0.85%

-90.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.75%

-8.14%

-58.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

Volatility

3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3CON.LXS2D.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

205.18%

22.81%

+182.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

205.18%

30.08%

+175.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

205.18%

31.29%

+173.89%

3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3CON.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XS2D.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

3CON.L vs. XS2D.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3CON.L nor XS2D.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3CON.L and XS2D.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XS2D.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XS2D.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3CON.L.

3CON.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x COIN Index, while XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3CON.L and 0.60% for XS2D.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3CON.L and XS2D.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer