3MST.L vs. SUK2.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

3MST.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP) and SUK2.L (L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - 3MST.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index, while SUK2.L is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the FTSE 100 Daily Super Short Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 3MST.L returned -80.48% vs -27.76% for SUK2.L. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. 3MST.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SUK2.L.

Performance

3MST.L vs. SUK2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) and L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SUK2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

3MST.L is traded in USD, while SUK2.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SUK2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3MST.L achieves a 788.22% return, which is significantly higher than SUK2.L's -12.76% return.

3MST.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -63.34%
• 6M: 617.30%
• YTD: 788.22%
• 1Y: -80.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SUK2.L

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -0.06%
• 6M: -7.23%
• YTD: -12.76%
• 1Y: -27.76%
• 3Y*: -18.78%
• 5Y*: -18.06%
• 10Y*: -16.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3MST.L vs. SUK2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
3MST.L Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP	788.22%	-98.41%	91.45%
SUK2.L L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)	-12.76%	-27.00%	-2.25%

Correlation

The correlation between 3MST.L and SUK2.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024	-0.14

Return for Risk

3MST.L vs. SUK2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3MST.L

3MST.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
3MST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
3MST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
3MST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100
3MST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
3MST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4

SUK2.L

SUK2.L Risk / Return Rank: 1
SUK2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
SUK2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SUK2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SUK2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SUK2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3MST.L vs. SUK2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) and L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SUK2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	3MST.L	SUK2.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	-1.21	+1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	81.51	-1.79	+83.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	9.39	0.80	+8.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	-0.91	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.05	-1.43	+0.38

3MST.L vs. SUK2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3MST.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is higher than the SUK2.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3MST.L and SUK2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

3MST.L vs. SUK2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3MST.L drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, roughly equal to the maximum SUK2.L drawdown of -98.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3MST.L and SUK2.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3MST.L	SUK2.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.93%	-98.65%	-1.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-99.39%	-30.34%	-69.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-49.91%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-65.86%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-85.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.56%	-98.60%	+1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.84%	-85.88%	+2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	76.90%	19.38%	+57.52%

Volatility

3MST.L vs. SUK2.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) has a higher volatility of 75.37% compared to L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SUK2.L) at 5.99%. This indicates that 3MST.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUK2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3MST.L	SUK2.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	75.37%	5.99%	+69.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	520.84%	19.39%	+501.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13,335.35%	22.87%	+13,312.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9,933.55%	25.52%	+9,908.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9,933.55%	30.86%	+9,902.69%

3MST.L vs. SUK2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3MST.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SUK2.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

3MST.L vs. SUK2.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3MST.L nor SUK2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3MST.L and SUK2.L in my portfolio?

3MST.L and SUK2.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3MST.L or SUK2.L?

On fees, SUK2.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3MST.L or SUK2.L?

SUK2.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3MST.L.

What is the main difference between 3MST.L and SUK2.L?

3MST.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SUK2.L is Inverse Equities. 3MST.L tracks Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index, while SUK2.L tracks FTSE 100 Daily Super Short Strategy Index. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3MST.L and 0.60% for SUK2.L.