3MST.L vs. QQQ3.L
3MST.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP) and QQQ3.L (WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged) are both exchange-traded funds - 3MST.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index, while QQQ3.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 3MST.L returned -99.29% vs 124.35% for QQQ3.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3MST.L vs. QQQ3.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3MST.L achieves a -78.63% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ3.L's 56.06% return.
3MST.L
- 1D
- -8.62%
- 1M
- -71.71%
- YTD
- -78.63%
- 6M
- -88.77%
- 1Y
- -99.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ3.L
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- 25.62%
- YTD
- 56.06%
- 6M
- 51.95%
- 1Y
- 124.35%
- 3Y*
- 64.10%
- 5Y*
- 26.81%
- 10Y*
- 43.93%
3MST.L vs. QQQ3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3MST.L Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP | -78.63% | -98.41% | 164.28% |
QQQ3.L WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged | 56.06% | 27.64% | 13.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3MST.L and QQQ3.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3MST.L vs. QQQ3.L — Risk / Return Rank
3MST.L
QQQ3.L
3MST.L vs. QQQ3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3MST.L | QQQ3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.38 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 3.44 | -4.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 10.78 | -11.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3MST.L | QQQ3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 2.63 | -3.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | 0.82 | -1.22 |
Drawdowns
3MST.L vs. QQQ3.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3MST.L drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than QQQ3.L's maximum drawdown of -81.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3MST.L and QQQ3.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3MST.L | QQQ3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -81.35% | -18.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.53% | -35.92% | -63.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.94% | -2.48% | -97.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.39% | -19.62% | -65.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 82.32% | 11.49% | +70.83% |
Volatility
3MST.L vs. QQQ3.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) has a higher volatility of 61.01% compared to WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) at 14.73%. This indicates that 3MST.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3MST.L | QQQ3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 61.01% | 14.73% | +46.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 160.17% | 34.78% | +125.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.97% | 47.01% | +151.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 236.29% | 62.24% | +174.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 236.29% | 59.91% | +176.38% |
3MST.L vs. QQQ3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3MST.L and QQQ3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3MST.L vs. QQQ3.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3MST.L nor QQQ3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3MST.L and QQQ3.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3MST.L and QQQ3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3MST.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ3.L is Nasdaq-100. 3MST.L tracks Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index, while QQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree.
Find the right allocation for 3MST.L and QQQ3.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer