3MST.L vs. MRN3.L
3MST.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP) and MRN3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Moderna (MRNA) ETP Securities) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3MST.L tracks the Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index while MRN3.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x MRNA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 3MST.L returned -99.29% vs 64.51% for MRN3.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3MST.L vs. MRN3.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3MST.L achieves a -78.63% return, which is significantly lower than MRN3.L's 156.89% return.
3MST.L
- 1D
- -8.62%
- 1M
- -71.71%
- YTD
- -78.63%
- 6M
- -88.77%
- 1Y
- -99.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MRN3.L
- 1D
- 26.04%
- 1M
- 21.33%
- YTD
- 156.89%
- 6M
- 287.40%
- 1Y
- 64.51%
- 3Y*
- -91.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3MST.L vs. MRN3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3MST.L Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP | -78.63% | -98.41% | 164.28% |
MRN3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Moderna (MRNA) ETP Securities | 156.89% | -93.67% | -82.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3MST.L and MRN3.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3MST.L vs. MRN3.L — Risk / Return Rank
3MST.L
MRN3.L
3MST.L vs. MRN3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Moderna (MRNA) ETP Securities (MRN3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3MST.L | MRN3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.24 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 0.79 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 1.25 | -2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3MST.L | MRN3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 0.30 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | -0.43 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
3MST.L vs. MRN3.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3MST.L drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, roughly equal to the maximum MRN3.L drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3MST.L and MRN3.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3MST.L | MRN3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -100.00% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.53% | -81.28% | -18.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -99.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.94% | -100.00% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.39% | -97.63% | +12.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 82.32% | 51.56% | +30.76% |
Volatility
3MST.L vs. MRN3.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) has a higher volatility of 61.01% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Moderna (MRNA) ETP Securities (MRN3.L) at 57.82%. This indicates that 3MST.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRN3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3MST.L | MRN3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 61.01% | 57.82% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 160.17% | 163.07% | -2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.97% | 210.95% | -11.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 236.29% | 221.82% | +14.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 236.29% | 221.82% | +14.47% |
3MST.L vs. MRN3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3MST.L and MRN3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3MST.L vs. MRN3.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3MST.L nor MRN3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3MST.L and MRN3.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3MST.L and MRN3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3MST.L tracks Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index, while MRN3.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x MRNA Index.
Find the right allocation for 3MST.L and MRN3.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer