3MST.L vs. 3TSM.L
3MST.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP) and 3TSM.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3MST.L tracks the Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index while 3TSM.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSM Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 3MST.L returned -99.29% vs 543.00% for 3TSM.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3MST.L vs. 3TSM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3MST.L achieves a -78.63% return, which is significantly lower than 3TSM.L's 149.88% return.
3MST.L
- 1D
- -8.62%
- 1M
- -71.71%
- YTD
- -78.63%
- 6M
- -88.77%
- 1Y
- -99.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3TSM.L
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- 41.02%
- YTD
- 149.88%
- 6M
- 166.79%
- 1Y
- 543.00%
- 3Y*
- 150.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3MST.L vs. 3TSM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3MST.L Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP | -78.63% | -98.41% | 164.28% |
3TSM.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities | 149.88% | 60.55% | 18.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3MST.L and 3TSM.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3MST.L vs. 3TSM.L — Risk / Return Rank
3MST.L
3TSM.L
3MST.L vs. 3TSM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3MST.L | 3TSM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.44 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 11.56 | -12.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 33.54 | -34.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3MST.L | 3TSM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 5.12 | -5.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | 0.36 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
3MST.L vs. 3TSM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3MST.L drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than 3TSM.L's maximum drawdown of -93.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3MST.L and 3TSM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3MST.L | 3TSM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -93.59% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.53% | -46.56% | -52.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -81.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.94% | 0.00% | -99.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.39% | -55.66% | -29.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 82.32% | 16.08% | +66.24% |
Volatility
3MST.L vs. 3TSM.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) has a higher volatility of 61.01% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) at 37.09%. This indicates that 3MST.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3TSM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3MST.L | 3TSM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 61.01% | 37.09% | +23.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 160.17% | 77.74% | +82.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.97% | 105.51% | +93.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 236.29% | 114.35% | +121.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 236.29% | 114.35% | +121.94% |
3MST.L vs. 3TSM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3MST.L and 3TSM.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3MST.L vs. 3TSM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3MST.L nor 3TSM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3MST.L and 3TSM.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3MST.L and 3TSM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3MST.L tracks Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index, while 3TSM.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSM Index.
Find the right allocation for 3MST.L and 3TSM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer