PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3MST.L vs. 3BAL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3MST.L vs. 3BAL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) and WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3MST.L is traded in USD, while 3BAL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3BAL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3MST.L achieves a 1,116.53% return, which is significantly higher than 3BAL.L's 23.21% return.


3MST.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-82.05%
YTD
1,116.53%
6M
1,089.46%
1Y
-58.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

3BAL.L

1D
2.07%
1M
21.10%
YTD
23.21%
6M
24.53%
1Y
172.92%
3Y*
158.51%
5Y*
69.15%
10Y*
21.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3MST.L vs. 3BAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
3MST.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP
1,116.53%-98.41%91.45%
3BAL.L
WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged
23.21%473.30%-3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between 3MST.L and 3BAL.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3MST.L vs. 3BAL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3MST.L
3MST.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
3MST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3MST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
3MST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
3MST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
3MST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

3BAL.L
3BAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3MST.L vs. 3BAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) and WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3MST.L3BAL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+82.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

9.89

1.34

+8.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

3.67

-4.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.78

9.67

-10.46

3MST.L vs. 3BAL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3MST.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the 3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3MST.L and 3BAL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3MST.L vs. 3BAL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3MST.L drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, roughly equal to the maximum 3BAL.L drawdown of -99.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3MST.L and 3BAL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3MST.L3BAL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.93%

-99.39%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.48%

-46.85%

-52.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.66%

-54.23%

-42.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.35%

-83.35%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

75.09%

17.80%

+57.29%

Volatility

3MST.L vs. 3BAL.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long MicroStrategy ETP (3MST.L) has a higher volatility of 85.00% compared to WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L) at 18.75%. This indicates that 3MST.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3BAL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3MST.L3BAL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

85.00%

18.75%

+66.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

518.03%

57.10%

+460.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13,334.98%

70.13%

+13,264.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10,112.41%

77.39%

+10,035.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10,112.41%

85.00%

+10,027.41%

3MST.L vs. 3BAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3MST.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than 3BAL.L's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

3MST.L vs. 3BAL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3MST.L nor 3BAL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3MST.L and 3BAL.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3MST.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3MST.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for 3BAL.L.

3MST.L tracks Euronext 3x Long MicroStrategy Index, while 3BAL.L tracks EURO STOXX Banks Daily Leverage 3 EUR Net Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3MST.L and 0.89% for 3BAL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3MST.L and 3BAL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer