PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3KOR.L vs. HQU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3KOR.L vs. HQU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3KOR.L is traded in USD, while HQU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the HQU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3KOR.L achieves a 432.95% return, which is significantly higher than HQU.TO's 38.96% return.


3KOR.L

1D
-13.87%
1M
39.61%
YTD
432.95%
6M
564.02%
1Y
1,566.06%
3Y*
102.71%
5Y*
10Y*

HQU.TO

1D
-0.83%
1M
16.07%
YTD
38.96%
6M
36.70%
1Y
76.70%
3Y*
45.11%
5Y*
19.55%
10Y*
32.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3KOR.L vs. HQU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3KOR.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities
432.95%356.68%-62.34%15.02%-56.31%
HQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF
38.96%32.84%28.95%118.87%-36.48%

Correlation

The correlation between 3KOR.L and HQU.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2022

0.40

3KOR.L vs. HQU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3KOR.L
HQU.TO

Technology

52.3%
52.7%

Industrials

20.4%
3.5%

Financial Services

9.5%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
14.3%

Healthcare

3.5%
5.0%

Communication Services

2.9%
15.2%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
5.5%

Energy

1.4%
0.6%

Utilities

0.4%
1.2%

Real Estate

-

0.2%

Technology

3KOR.L
52.3%
HQU.TO
52.7%

Industrials

3KOR.L
20.4%
HQU.TO
3.5%

Financial Services

3KOR.L
9.5%
HQU.TO
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3KOR.L
5.8%
HQU.TO
14.3%

Healthcare

3KOR.L
3.5%
HQU.TO
5.0%

Communication Services

3KOR.L
2.9%
HQU.TO
15.2%

Basic Materials

3KOR.L
2.0%
HQU.TO
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

3KOR.L
1.8%
HQU.TO
5.5%

Energy

3KOR.L
1.4%
HQU.TO
0.6%

Utilities

3KOR.L
0.4%
HQU.TO
1.2%

Real Estate

3KOR.L

-

HQU.TO
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3KOR.L vs. HQU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3KOR.L
3KOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
3KOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

HQU.TO
HQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3KOR.L vs. HQU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3KOR.LHQU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+10.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.37

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

25.76

3.06

+22.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

79.33

11.13

+68.20

3KOR.L vs. HQU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3KOR.L Sharpe Ratio is 12.65, which is higher than the HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3KOR.L and HQU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3KOR.LHQU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.65

2.38

+10.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.17

+0.36

Drawdowns

3KOR.L vs. HQU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3KOR.L drawdown since its inception was -85.50%, which is greater than HQU.TO's maximum drawdown of -76.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3KOR.L and HQU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3KOR.LHQU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.50%

-76.46%

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.08%

-25.71%

-34.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.11%

-43.07%

-33.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.12%

-0.83%

-15.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.83%

-33.28%

-19.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.55%

7.05%

+12.50%

Volatility

3KOR.L vs. HQU.TO - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) has a higher volatility of 54.37% compared to BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) at 9.50%. This indicates that 3KOR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HQU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3KOR.LHQU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

54.37%

9.50%

+44.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

98.72%

25.40%

+73.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

122.51%

33.13%

+89.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.56%

47.78%

+38.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.56%

47.65%

+38.91%

Dividends

3KOR.L vs. HQU.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3KOR.L nor HQU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3KOR.L and HQU.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

3KOR.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HQU.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3KOR.L and HQU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer