3JPN.DE vs. 18MF.DE
3JPN.DE (Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities) and 18MF.DE (Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. 3JPN.DE is actively managed, while 18MF.DE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3JPN.DE returned 20.30%/yr vs 32.82%/yr for 18MF.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3JPN.DE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for 18MF.DE.
Performance
3JPN.DE vs. 18MF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3JPN.DE achieves a 37.51% return, which is significantly higher than 18MF.DE's 21.45% return.
3JPN.DE
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 37.51%
- 6M
- 34.92%
- 1Y
- 72.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
18MF.DE
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- 21.45%
- 6M
- 19.74%
- 1Y
- 49.73%
- 3Y*
- 32.82%
- 5Y*
- 23.27%
- 10Y*
- 25.40%
3JPN.DE vs. 18MF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3JPN.DE Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities | 37.51% | 27.74% | 0.10% | 34.83% | 0.88% |
18MF.DE Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF | 21.45% | 1.66% | 64.13% | 43.13% | -21.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3JPN.DE and 18MF.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2022 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3JPN.DE vs. 18MF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
3JPN.DE
18MF.DE
3JPN.DE vs. 18MF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE) and Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3JPN.DE | 18MF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.37 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 3.33 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 11.13 | -5.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3JPN.DE | 18MF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.13 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.82 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
3JPN.DE vs. 18MF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3JPN.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.65%, smaller than the maximum 18MF.DE drawdown of -59.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3JPN.DE and 18MF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3JPN.DE | 18MF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.65% | -59.67% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.71% | -14.95% | -19.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.65% | -42.90% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.07% | -0.83% | -6.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.56% | -9.91% | -4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.19% | 4.48% | +7.71% |
Volatility
3JPN.DE vs. 18MF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.68% compared to Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE) at 5.41%. This indicates that 3JPN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 18MF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3JPN.DE | 18MF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.68% | 5.41% | +6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.68% | 15.46% | +33.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.28% | 23.36% | +36.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.77% | 30.89% | +21.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.77% | 32.49% | +20.28% |
3JPN.DE vs. 18MF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
3JPN.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than 18MF.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
3JPN.DE vs. 18MF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3JPN.DE nor 18MF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3JPN.DE and 18MF.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 18MF.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
18MF.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3JPN.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3JPN.DE and 0.50% for 18MF.DE.
Find the right allocation for 3JPN.DE and 18MF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer