PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GOE.L vs. DES2.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3GOE.L vs. DES2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DES2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3GOE.L is traded in USD, while DES2.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DES2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GOE.L achieves a 20.71% return, which is significantly higher than DES2.L's -7.88% return.


3GOE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-13.16%
6M
0.13%
YTD
20.71%
1Y
383.29%
3Y*
85.73%
5Y*
20.01%
10Y*

DES2.L

1D
1.39%
1M
-1.94%
6M
-2.03%
YTD
-7.88%
1Y
-10.70%
3Y*
-24.00%
5Y*
-20.76%
10Y*
-23.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3GOE.L vs. DES2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3GOE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs
20.71%133.65%89.16%159.88%-86.56%320.07%40.96%
DES2.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-7.88%-27.59%-29.84%-26.03%1.35%-36.20%-18.18%

Correlation

The correlation between 3GOE.L and DES2.L is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

-0.40

The correlation between 3GOE.L and DES2.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.40 (all time) to -0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3GOE.L vs. DES2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GOE.L
3GOE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

DES2.L
DES2.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
DES2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DES2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
DES2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
DES2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
DES2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GOE.L vs. DES2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DES2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3GOE.LDES2.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

0.97

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.49

-0.40

+7.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.23

-0.88

+21.11

3GOE.L vs. DES2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.19, which is higher than the DES2.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GOE.L and DES2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3GOE.L vs. DES2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GOE.L drawdown since its inception was -88.62%, smaller than the maximum DES2.L drawdown of -99.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GOE.L and DES2.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3GOE.LDES2.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.62%

-99.65%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.18%

-26.68%

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.84%

-64.39%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.62%

-76.16%

-12.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.13%

-99.63%

+67.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.08%

-88.43%

+45.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.95%

12.13%

+6.82%

Volatility

3GOE.L vs. DES2.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) has a higher volatility of 29.11% compared to L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DES2.L) at 9.17%. This indicates that 3GOE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DES2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3GOE.LDES2.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.11%

9.17%

+19.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.43%

26.51%

+35.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.72%

32.21%

+59.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.84%

33.30%

+57.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.90%

36.16%

+52.74%

3GOE.L vs. DES2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3GOE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DES2.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

3GOE.L vs. DES2.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GOE.L nor DES2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3GOE.L and DES2.L have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DES2.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DES2.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3GOE.L.

3GOE.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DES2.L is Inverse Equities. 3GOE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index, while DES2.L tracks ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3GOE.L and 0.60% for DES2.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3GOE.L and DES2.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer