PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GOE.L vs. 3AAP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3GOE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3GOE.L is traded in USD, while 3AAP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3AAP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GOE.L achieves a 37.40% return, which is significantly higher than 3AAP.L's 29.54% return.


3GOE.L

1D
10.59%
1M
-15.25%
YTD
37.40%
6M
29.89%
1Y
597.07%
3Y*
85.68%
5Y*
28.94%
10Y*

3AAP.L

1D
-0.93%
1M
33.82%
YTD
29.54%
6M
17.70%
1Y
160.00%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
22.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3GOE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3GOE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs
37.40%133.65%89.16%159.88%-86.56%320.07%40.96%
3AAP.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP
29.54%-22.82%67.19%164.98%-76.46%93.21%245.22%

Correlation

The correlation between 3GOE.L and 3AAP.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between 3GOE.L and 3AAP.L has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3GOE.L vs. 3AAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GOE.L
3GOE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

3AAP.L
3AAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GOE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3GOE.L3AAP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.35

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.56

3.55

+8.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.18

7.08

+29.10

3GOE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.77, which is higher than the 3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GOE.L and 3AAP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3GOE.L3AAP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.77

1.60

+5.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.26

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.42

+0.16

Drawdowns

3GOE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GOE.L drawdown since its inception was -88.62%, which is greater than 3AAP.L's maximum drawdown of -78.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GOE.L and 3AAP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3GOE.L3AAP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.62%

-78.42%

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.18%

-44.81%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.84%

-73.03%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.62%

-78.42%

-10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.74%

-2.86%

-19.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.41%

-35.89%

-7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.39%

22.48%

-6.09%

Volatility

3GOE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) has a higher volatility of 24.09% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) at 15.12%. This indicates that 3GOE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3AAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3GOE.L3AAP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.09%

15.12%

+8.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.21%

49.41%

+5.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.38%

99.40%

-12.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.79%

88.26%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.29%

90.10%

-0.81%

3GOE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3GOE.L and 3AAP.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3GOE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GOE.L nor 3AAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3GOE.L and 3AAP.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3GOE.L and 3AAP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3GOE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index, while 3AAP.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3GOE.L and 3AAP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer