3GDE.L vs. 3CON.L
3GDE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR) and 3CON.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3GDE.L is actively managed, while 3CON.L is passively managed. Over the past year, 3GDE.L returned 29.50% vs -98.55% for 3CON.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3GDE.L vs. 3CON.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3GDE.L is traded in EUR, while 3CON.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3CON.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3GDE.L achieves a -61.40% return, which is significantly higher than 3CON.L's -89.36% return.
3GDE.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -41.13%
- YTD
- -61.40%
- 6M
- -66.60%
- 1Y
- 29.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3CON.L
- 1D
- -16.92%
- 1M
- -55.41%
- YTD
- -89.36%
- 6M
- -90.47%
- 1Y
- -98.55%
- 3Y*
- -68.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3GDE.L vs. 3CON.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3GDE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR | -61.40% | 690.23% | -18.68% |
3CON.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP | -89.36% | -89.88% | -77.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3GDE.L and 3CON.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2024 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3GDE.L vs. 3CON.L — Risk / Return Rank
3GDE.L
3CON.L
3GDE.L vs. 3CON.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR (3GDE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 3GDE.L | 3CON.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.83 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | -0.99 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | -1.19 | +1.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
3GDE.L vs. 3CON.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3GDE.L drawdown since its inception was -81.14%, smaller than the maximum 3CON.L drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GDE.L and 3CON.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3GDE.L | 3CON.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.14% | -100.00% | +18.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.14% | -99.17% | +18.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -99.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.14% | -99.86% | +18.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.78% | -79.82% | +55.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.42% | 83.20% | -44.78% |
Volatility
3GDE.L vs. 3CON.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR (3GDE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) have volatilities of 55.92% and 56.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3GDE.L | 3CON.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.92% | 56.54% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 116.83% | 144.79% | -27.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.02% | 198.81% | -58.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.89% | 1,448,193.95% | -1,448,075.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 118.89% | 1,448,193.95% | -1,448,075.06% |
3GDE.L vs. 3CON.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3GDE.L and 3CON.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3GDE.L vs. 3CON.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3GDE.L nor 3CON.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3GDE.L and 3CON.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3GDE.L and 3CON.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
Find the right allocation for 3GDE.L and 3CON.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer