PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GDE.L vs. 3PLT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3GDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR (3GDE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3GDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3GDE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR
0.78%690.23%-13.19%-17.59%-53.82%13.19%
3PLT.L
Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities
-58.17%140.95%2,654.33%373.41%-99.45%1.45%
Different Trading Currencies

3GDE.L is traded in EUR, while 3PLT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3PLT.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GDE.L achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than 3PLT.L's -58.17% return.


3GDE.L

1D
22.17%
1M
-45.13%
YTD
0.78%
6M
17.19%
1Y
262.49%
3Y*
65.80%
5Y*
10Y*

3PLT.L

1D
9.16%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
-58.17%
6M
-69.75%
1Y
46.52%
3Y*
338.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3GDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3GDE.L and 3PLT.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

3GDE.L vs. 3PLT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GDE.L
3GDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
3GDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
3GDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

3PLT.L
3PLT.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR (3GDE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3GDE.L3PLT.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.98

0.29

+1.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

1.58

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.20

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

0.45

+3.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.11

0.90

+10.22

3GDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GDE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the 3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GDE.L and 3PLT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3GDE.L3PLT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

0.29

+1.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

-0.14

+0.43

Correlation

The correlation between 3GDE.L and 3PLT.L is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

3GDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GDE.L nor 3PLT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3GDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GDE.L drawdown since its inception was -89.24%, smaller than the maximum 3PLT.L drawdown of -99.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GDE.L and 3PLT.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3GDE.L3PLT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.24%

-99.89%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.58%

-83.56%

+13.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.76%

-83.63%

+32.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.08%

-84.57%

+21.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.96%

41.68%

-16.72%

Volatility

3GDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR (3GDE.L) has a higher volatility of 55.34% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) at 33.91%. This indicates that 3GDE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3PLT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3GDE.L3PLT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

55.34%

33.91%

+21.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

112.24%

109.37%

+2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

131.99%

161.69%

-29.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

108.33%

194.63%

-86.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.33%

194.63%

-86.30%