3GDE.L vs. 2AMD.L
3GDE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR) and 2AMD.L (Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3GDE.L is actively managed, while 2AMD.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3GDE.L returned 48.28%/yr vs 78.24%/yr for 2AMD.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3GDE.L vs. 2AMD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3GDE.L is traded in EUR, while 2AMD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2AMD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3GDE.L achieves a -37.35% return, which is significantly lower than 2AMD.L's 371.70% return.
3GDE.L
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -22.60%
- YTD
- -37.35%
- 6M
- -28.76%
- 1Y
- 83.79%
- 3Y*
- 48.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2AMD.L
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- 110.74%
- YTD
- 371.70%
- 6M
- 347.82%
- 1Y
- 1,092.47%
- 3Y*
- 78.24%
- 5Y*
- 46.91%
- 10Y*
- —
3GDE.L vs. 2AMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3GDE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR | -37.35% | 690.23% | -13.19% | -17.59% | -53.82% | 13.19% |
2AMD.L Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP | 371.78% | 72.88% | -47.46% | 293.28% | -86.97% | 17.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3GDE.L and 2AMD.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3GDE.L vs. 2AMD.L — Risk / Return Rank
3GDE.L
2AMD.L
3GDE.L vs. 2AMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR (3GDE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3GDE.L | 2AMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.61 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 19.80 | -18.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.47 | 38.85 | -36.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3GDE.L | 2AMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 8.59 | -7.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.50 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
3GDE.L vs. 2AMD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3GDE.L drawdown since its inception was -89.24%, roughly equal to the maximum 2AMD.L drawdown of -91.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GDE.L and 2AMD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3GDE.L | 2AMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.24% | -91.49% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.29% | -54.60% | -16.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.29% | -89.50% | +18.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -91.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.39% | -2.79% | -66.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.96% | -54.63% | -8.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.13% | 27.87% | +6.26% |
Volatility
3GDE.L vs. 2AMD.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR (3GDE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) have volatilities of 46.44% and 46.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3GDE.L | 2AMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.44% | 46.76% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 107.37% | 88.17% | +19.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 130.76% | 125.87% | +4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.47% | 104.70% | +4.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.47% | 102.37% | +7.10% |
3GDE.L vs. 2AMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3GDE.L and 2AMD.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3GDE.L vs. 2AMD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3GDE.L nor 2AMD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3GDE.L and 2AMD.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3GDE.L and 2AMD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
Find the right allocation for 3GDE.L and 2AMD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer