PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3DIE.L vs. 3BP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3DIE.L vs. 3BP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Disney ETC EUR (3DIE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3DIE.L is traded in EUR, while 3BP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3BP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3DIE.L achieves a -42.05% return, which is significantly lower than 3BP.L's 76.87% return.


3DIE.L

1D
2.26%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
-42.05%
6M
-25.17%
1Y
-50.87%
3Y*
-24.83%
5Y*
10Y*

3BP.L

1D
-1.68%
1M
-16.49%
YTD
76.87%
6M
38.85%
1Y
161.91%
3Y*
-2.39%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3DIE.L vs. 3BP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3DIE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Disney ETC EUR
-42.05%-36.83%42.39%-22.57%-89.62%-31.31%
3BP.L
Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX
76.87%10.73%-47.57%-13.44%50.69%-7.57%

Correlation

The correlation between 3DIE.L and 3BP.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021

0.13

The correlation between 3DIE.L and 3BP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

3DIE.L vs. 3BP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3DIE.L
3BP.L

Communication Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

3DIE.L
100.0%
3BP.L

-

Basic Materials

3DIE.L

-

3BP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

3DIE.L

-

3BP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

3DIE.L

-

3BP.L

-

Energy

3DIE.L

-

3BP.L
100.0%

Financial Services

3DIE.L

-

3BP.L

-

Healthcare

3DIE.L

-

3BP.L

-

Industrials

3DIE.L

-

3BP.L

-

Real Estate

3DIE.L

-

3BP.L

-

Technology

3DIE.L

-

3BP.L

-

Utilities

3DIE.L

-

3BP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3DIE.L vs. 3BP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3DIE.L
3DIE.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
3DIE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3DIE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
3DIE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
3DIE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
3DIE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

3BP.L
3BP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
3BP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
3BP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3DIE.L vs. 3BP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Disney ETC EUR (3DIE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3DIE.L3BP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.30

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

4.12

-4.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

11.42

-12.70

3DIE.L vs. 3BP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3DIE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the 3BP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3DIE.L and 3BP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3DIE.L3BP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

1.89

-2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.60

0.06

-0.66

Drawdowns

3DIE.L vs. 3BP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3DIE.L drawdown since its inception was -97.95%, which is greater than 3BP.L's maximum drawdown of -84.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3DIE.L and 3BP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3DIE.L3BP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.95%

-84.99%

-12.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.02%

-39.10%

-26.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.92%

-82.35%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.58%

-45.40%

-52.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.88%

-42.92%

-44.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.57%

14.12%

+25.45%

Volatility

3DIE.L vs. 3BP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Disney ETC EUR (3DIE.L) is 23.87%, while Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L) has a volatility of 29.66%. This indicates that 3DIE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3BP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3DIE.L3BP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.87%

29.66%

-5.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.89%

74.48%

-15.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.00%

85.26%

-12.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.74%

90.72%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.74%

91.08%

+0.66%

3DIE.L vs. 3BP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3DIE.L and 3BP.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3DIE.L vs. 3BP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3DIE.L nor 3BP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3DIE.L and 3BP.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3DIE.L and 3BP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3DIE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x DIS Index, while 3BP.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x BP Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3DIE.L and 3BP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer