PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3DIE.L vs. 3SPY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3DIE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Disney ETC EUR (3DIE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3DIE.L is traded in EUR, while 3SPY.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3SPY.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3DIE.L achieves a -43.33% return, which is significantly lower than 3SPY.L's 25.83% return.


3DIE.L

1D
-3.07%
1M
-12.65%
YTD
-43.33%
6M
-26.33%
1Y
-52.78%
3Y*
-25.76%
5Y*
10Y*

3SPY.L

1D
-0.84%
1M
15.08%
YTD
25.83%
6M
24.95%
1Y
69.97%
3Y*
38.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3DIE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3DIE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Disney ETC EUR
-43.33%-36.83%42.39%-22.57%-65.02%
3SPY.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities
25.83%-0.95%74.55%53.49%-41.55%

Correlation

The correlation between 3DIE.L and 3SPY.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2022

0.46

The correlation between 3DIE.L and 3SPY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3DIE.L vs. 3SPY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3DIE.L
3DIE.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
3DIE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3DIE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
3DIE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
3DIE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
3DIE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

3SPY.L
3SPY.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
3SPY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3DIE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Disney ETC EUR (3DIE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3DIE.L3SPY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.36

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

1.71

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

3.41

-4.75

3DIE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3DIE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the 3SPY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3DIE.L and 3SPY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3DIE.L3SPY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

1.27

-2.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.61

0.35

-0.96

Drawdowns

3DIE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3DIE.L drawdown since its inception was -97.95%, which is greater than 3SPY.L's maximum drawdown of -58.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3DIE.L and 3SPY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3DIE.L3SPY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.95%

-58.69%

-39.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.02%

-40.75%

-25.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.92%

-58.69%

-22.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.64%

-6.92%

-90.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.87%

-21.27%

-66.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.39%

20.45%

+18.94%

Volatility

3DIE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Disney ETC EUR (3DIE.L) has a higher volatility of 25.04% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L) at 8.42%. This indicates that 3DIE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3SPY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3DIE.L3SPY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.04%

8.42%

+16.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.06%

23.29%

+35.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.13%

54.72%

+18.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.77%

51.67%

+40.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.77%

51.67%

+40.10%

3DIE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3DIE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than 3SPY.L's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

3DIE.L vs. 3SPY.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3DIE.L nor 3SPY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3DIE.L and 3SPY.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3SPY.L is cheaper at 0.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3SPY.L is cheaper with a 0.01% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3DIE.L.

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3DIE.L and 0.01% for 3SPY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3DIE.L and 3SPY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer