3CON.L vs. 3GDE.L
3CON.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP) and 3GDE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3CON.L is passively managed, while 3GDE.L is actively managed. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3CON.L vs. 3GDE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3CON.L is traded in GBp, while 3GDE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 3GDE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
3CON.L
- 1D
- -22.83%
- 1M
- -57.54%
- YTD
- -87.66%
- 6M
- -92.40%
- 1Y
- -96.32%
- 3Y*
- -60.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3GDE.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3CON.L vs. 3GDE.L — Risk / Return Rank
3CON.L
3GDE.L
3CON.L vs. 3GDE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR (3GDE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3CON.L | 3GDE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3CON.L | 3GDE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | — | — |
Drawdowns
3CON.L vs. 3GDE.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3CON.L | 3GDE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.83% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.89% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 79.86% | — | — |
Volatility
3CON.L vs. 3GDE.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3CON.L | 3GDE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 58.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 141.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 200.92% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1,473,844.36% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,473,844.36% | — | — |
3CON.L vs. 3GDE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3CON.L and 3GDE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3CON.L vs. 3GDE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3CON.L nor 3GDE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3CON.L and 3GDE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
Find the right allocation for 3CON.L and 3GDE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer