3CON.L vs. 2MU.L
3CON.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP) and 2MU.L (Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3CON.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x COIN Index while 2MU.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 2X MU Index. Both are passively managed. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3CON.L vs. 2MU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
3CON.L
- 1D
- -22.83%
- 1M
- -57.54%
- YTD
- -87.66%
- 6M
- -92.40%
- 1Y
- -96.32%
- 3Y*
- -60.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2MU.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3CON.L vs. 2MU.L — Risk / Return Rank
3CON.L
2MU.L
3CON.L vs. 2MU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3CON.L | 2MU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3CON.L | 2MU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | — | — |
Drawdowns
3CON.L vs. 2MU.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3CON.L | 2MU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.83% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.89% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 79.86% | — | — |
Volatility
3CON.L vs. 2MU.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3CON.L | 2MU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 58.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 141.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 200.92% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1,473,844.36% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,473,844.36% | — | — |
3CON.L vs. 2MU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3CON.L and 2MU.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3CON.L vs. 2MU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3CON.L nor 2MU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3CON.L and 2MU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3CON.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x COIN Index, while 2MU.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 2X MU Index.
Find the right allocation for 3CON.L and 2MU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer