3BID.L vs. 3MSF.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

3BID.L (Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP) and 3MSF.L (Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3BID.L tracks the Solactive Leveraged 3x BIDU Index while 3MSF.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3BID.L returned -52.39%/yr vs -9.61%/yr for 3MSF.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

3BID.L vs. 3MSF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP (3BID.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3BID.L achieves a -29.92% return, which is significantly higher than 3MSF.L's -43.87% return.

3BID.L

• 1D: -5.04%
• 1M: 4.03%
• YTD: -29.92%
• 6M: -6.51%
• 1Y: 63.77%
• 3Y*: -52.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3MSF.L

• 1D: 2.31%
• 1M: 11.27%
• YTD: -43.87%
• 6M: -42.12%
• 1Y: -43.56%
• 3Y*: -9.61%
• 5Y*: 1.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3BID.L vs. 3MSF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
3BID.L Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP	-29.92%	54.89%	-80.82%	-49.94%	-88.69%	-61.82%
3MSF.L Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP	-43.87%	-1.14%	15.47%	170.19%	-74.05%	114.85%

Correlation

The correlation between 3BID.L and 3MSF.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021	0.20

3BID.L vs. 3MSF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	3BID.L	3MSF.L
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

3BID.L vs. 3MSF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3BID.L

3BID.L Risk / Return Rank: 23
3BID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
3BID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
3BID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
3BID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
3BID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

3MSF.L

3MSF.L Risk / Return Rank: 5
3MSF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
3MSF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
3MSF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6
3MSF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
3MSF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3BID.L vs. 3MSF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP (3BID.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	3BID.L	3MSF.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	-0.49	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	-0.26	+1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.96	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	-0.55	+1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.49	-0.91	+2.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

3BID.L vs. 3MSF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3BID.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the 3MSF.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3BID.L and 3MSF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3BID.L	3MSF.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46	-0.49	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.45	0.14	-0.59

Drawdowns

3BID.L vs. 3MSF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3BID.L drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than 3MSF.L's maximum drawdown of -81.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3BID.L and 3MSF.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3BID.L	3MSF.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.84%	-81.42%	-18.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.41%	-79.39%	+4.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.25%	-79.39%	-16.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-81.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.68%	-68.07%	-31.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-91.43%	-36.12%	-55.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.73%	47.82%	-5.09%

Volatility

3BID.L vs. 3MSF.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP (3BID.L) has a higher volatility of 55.32% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L) at 31.04%. This indicates that 3BID.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3MSF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3BID.L	3MSF.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	55.32%	31.04%	+24.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	100.16%	75.10%	+25.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	139.35%	88.44%	+50.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	147.39%	80.48%	+66.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	147.39%	80.21%	+67.18%

3BID.L vs. 3MSF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3BID.L and 3MSF.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

3BID.L vs. 3MSF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3BID.L nor 3MSF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3BID.L and 3MSF.L in my portfolio?

3BID.L and 3MSF.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3BID.L or 3MSF.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3BID.L or 3MSF.L?

3BID.L and 3MSF.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

What is the main difference between 3BID.L and 3MSF.L?

3BID.L tracks Solactive Leveraged 3x BIDU Index, while 3MSF.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index.