PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3AME.L vs. 3BP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3AME.L vs. 3BP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) and Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3AME.L is traded in EUR, while 3BP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3BP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3AME.L achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than 3BP.L's 76.87% return.


3AME.L

1D
6.10%
1M
-22.05%
YTD
12.32%
6M
15.92%
1Y
21.25%
3Y*
26.64%
5Y*
10Y*

3BP.L

1D
-1.68%
1M
-16.49%
YTD
76.87%
6M
38.85%
1Y
161.91%
3Y*
-2.39%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3AME.L vs. 3BP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3AME.L
Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR
12.32%-41.33%120.90%275.57%-71.73%
3BP.L
Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX
76.87%10.73%-47.57%-13.44%71.46%

Correlation

The correlation between 3AME.L and 3BP.L is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.06

The correlation between 3AME.L and 3BP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

3AME.L vs. 3BP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3AME.L
3BP.L

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

3AME.L
100.0%
3BP.L

-

Basic Materials

3AME.L

-

3BP.L

-

Communication Services

3AME.L

-

3BP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

3AME.L

-

3BP.L

-

Energy

3AME.L

-

3BP.L
100.0%

Financial Services

3AME.L

-

3BP.L

-

Healthcare

3AME.L

-

3BP.L

-

Industrials

3AME.L

-

3BP.L

-

Real Estate

3AME.L

-

3BP.L

-

Technology

3AME.L

-

3BP.L

-

Utilities

3AME.L

-

3BP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3AME.L vs. 3BP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3AME.L
3AME.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
3AME.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AME.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AME.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
3AME.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AME.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

3BP.L
3BP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
3BP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
3BP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3AME.L vs. 3BP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) and Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3AME.L3BP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.30

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

4.12

-3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

11.42

-10.68

3AME.L vs. 3BP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3AME.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the 3BP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3AME.L and 3BP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3AME.L3BP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

1.89

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.06

+0.06

Drawdowns

3AME.L vs. 3BP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3AME.L drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, roughly equal to the maximum 3BP.L drawdown of -84.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AME.L and 3BP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3AME.L3BP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.29%

-84.99%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.73%

-39.10%

-20.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.04%

-82.35%

+9.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.36%

-45.40%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.24%

-42.92%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.74%

14.12%

+14.62%

Volatility

3AME.L vs. 3BP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) is 27.49%, while Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L) has a volatility of 29.66%. This indicates that 3AME.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3BP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3AME.L3BP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.49%

29.66%

-2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.07%

74.48%

-4.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.62%

85.26%

+5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.64%

90.72%

+9.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.64%

91.08%

+9.56%

3AME.L vs. 3BP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3AME.L and 3BP.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3AME.L vs. 3BP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3AME.L nor 3BP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3AME.L and 3BP.L have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3AME.L and 3BP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3AME.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AMZN Index, while 3BP.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x BP Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3AME.L and 3BP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer