3AME.L vs. QQQY.L
3AME.L (Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR) and QQQY.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - 3AME.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AMZN Index, while QQQY.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. 3AME.L is passively managed, while QQQY.L is actively managed. Over the past year, 3AME.L returned 21.25% vs 29.60% for QQQY.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3AME.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQQY.L.
Performance
3AME.L vs. QQQY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3AME.L is traded in EUR, while QQQY.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQY.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3AME.L achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY.L's 16.42% return.
3AME.L
- 1D
- 6.10%
- 1M
- -22.05%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 6M
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- 21.25%
- 3Y*
- 26.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY.L
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 8.36%
- YTD
- 16.42%
- 6M
- 15.06%
- 1Y
- 29.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3AME.L vs. QQQY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3AME.L Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR | 12.32% | -41.33% | 107.17% |
QQQY.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP | 16.42% | 0.69% | 15.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3AME.L and QQQY.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3AME.L vs. QQQY.L — Risk / Return Rank
3AME.L
QQQY.L
3AME.L vs. QQQY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3AME.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.37 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 4.12 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.74 | 9.71 | -8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3AME.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 1.85 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.82 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
3AME.L vs. QQQY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3AME.L drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than QQQY.L's maximum drawdown of -25.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AME.L and QQQY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3AME.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.29% | -25.62% | -60.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.73% | -7.14% | -52.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.36% | -0.96% | -46.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.24% | -6.62% | -39.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.74% | 3.04% | +25.70% |
Volatility
3AME.L vs. QQQY.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) has a higher volatility of 27.49% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) at 4.55%. This indicates that 3AME.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3AME.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.49% | 4.55% | +22.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.07% | 10.42% | +59.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.62% | 15.91% | +74.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.64% | 22.52% | +78.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.64% | 22.52% | +78.12% |
3AME.L vs. QQQY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3AME.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
3AME.L vs. QQQY.L - Dividend Comparison
3AME.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
3AME.L Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQY.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP | 67.73% | 120.60% | 18.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
3AME.L and QQQY.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQY.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQY.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3AME.L.
3AME.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQY.L is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3AME.L and 0.45% for QQQY.L.
Find the right allocation for 3AME.L and QQQY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer