PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3ABE.L vs. 2MU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3ABE.L vs. 2MU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETC EUR (3ABE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3ABE.L is traded in EUR, while 2MU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2MU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3ABE.L achieves a -16.89% return, which is significantly lower than 2MU.L's 791.61% return.


3ABE.L

1D
7.81%
1M
-8.84%
YTD
-16.89%
6M
19.33%
1Y
-32.35%
3Y*
-27.16%
5Y*
10Y*

2MU.L

1D
-10.88%
1M
127.93%
YTD
791.61%
6M
1,311.15%
1Y
5,374.31%
3Y*
287.90%
5Y*
94.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3ABE.L vs. 2MU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3ABE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETC EUR
-16.89%-45.87%-43.38%113.95%-96.38%7.45%
2MU.L
Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP
791.61%516.33%-27.24%148.10%-77.67%40.43%

Correlation

The correlation between 3ABE.L and 2MU.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3ABE.L vs. 2MU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3ABE.L
3ABE.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
3ABE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3ABE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
3ABE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
3ABE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
3ABE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

2MU.L
2MU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
2MU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2MU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
2MU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
2MU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
2MU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3ABE.L vs. 2MU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETC EUR (3ABE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3ABE.L2MU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-41.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.88

-0.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

98.49

-99.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

345.25

-346.10

3ABE.L vs. 2MU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3ABE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the 2MU.L Sharpe Ratio of 41.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3ABE.L and 2MU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3ABE.L2MU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

41.17

-41.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.96

-1.41

Drawdowns

3ABE.L vs. 2MU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3ABE.L drawdown since its inception was -99.31%, which is greater than 2MU.L's maximum drawdown of -89.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3ABE.L and 2MU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3ABE.L2MU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.31%

-89.28%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.55%

-53.70%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.71%

-89.28%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.02%

-10.88%

-88.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.06%

-44.72%

-40.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.29%

15.35%

+22.94%

Volatility

3ABE.L vs. 2MU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETC EUR (3ABE.L) is 26.11%, while Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) has a volatility of 46.27%. This indicates that 3ABE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2MU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3ABE.L2MU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.11%

46.27%

-20.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.60%

97.45%

-27.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.23%

128.49%

-42.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

156.33%

105.40%

+50.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

156.33%

101.42%

+54.91%

3ABE.L vs. 2MU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3ABE.L and 2MU.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3ABE.L vs. 2MU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3ABE.L nor 2MU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3ABE.L and 2MU.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3ABE.L and 2MU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3ABE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x ABNB Index, while 2MU.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 2X MU Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3ABE.L and 2MU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer