PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3ABE.L vs. 2BRE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3ABE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETC EUR (3ABE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3ABE.L achieves a -16.89% return, which is significantly lower than 2BRE.L's -13.89% return.


3ABE.L

1D
7.81%
1M
-8.84%
YTD
-16.89%
6M
19.33%
1Y
-32.35%
3Y*
-27.16%
5Y*
10Y*

2BRE.L

1D
0.62%
1M
3.98%
YTD
-13.89%
6M
-14.34%
1Y
-18.63%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3ABE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3ABE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETC EUR
-16.89%-45.87%-43.38%113.95%-96.38%17.90%
2BRE.L
Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR
-13.89%-4.91%55.13%18.25%4.42%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between 3ABE.L and 2BRE.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3ABE.L vs. 2BRE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3ABE.L
3ABE.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
3ABE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3ABE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
3ABE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
3ABE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
3ABE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

2BRE.L
2BRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
2BRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3ABE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETC EUR (3ABE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3ABE.L2BRE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.91

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

-0.82

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

-1.60

+0.76

3ABE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3ABE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is higher than the 2BRE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3ABE.L and 2BRE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3ABE.L2BRE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

-0.66

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.30

-0.75

Drawdowns

3ABE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3ABE.L drawdown since its inception was -99.31%, which is greater than 2BRE.L's maximum drawdown of -40.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3ABE.L and 2BRE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3ABE.L2BRE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.31%

-40.62%

-58.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.55%

-22.65%

-34.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.71%

-39.67%

-50.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.02%

-37.26%

-61.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.06%

-19.10%

-65.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.29%

11.62%

+26.67%

Volatility

3ABE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETC EUR (3ABE.L) has a higher volatility of 26.11% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L) at 7.24%. This indicates that 3ABE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2BRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3ABE.L2BRE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.11%

7.24%

+18.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.60%

20.36%

+49.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.23%

28.18%

+58.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

156.33%

37.23%

+119.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

156.33%

37.23%

+119.10%

3ABE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3ABE.L and 2BRE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3ABE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3ABE.L nor 2BRE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3ABE.L and 2BRE.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3ABE.L and 2BRE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3ABE.L and 2BRE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer