PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
3988.HK vs. CICHF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


3988.HKCICHF
YTD Return29.53%30.96%
1Y Return27.70%27.65%
3Y Return (Ann)16.88%15.24%
5Y Return (Ann)10.30%10.84%
10Y Return (Ann)8.07%20.95%
Sharpe Ratio1.220.63
Daily Std Dev19.91%62.63%
Max Drawdown-66.11%-90.95%
Current Drawdown-0.26%0.00%

Fundamentals


3988.HKCICHF
Market CapHK$1.33T$182.91B
EPSHK$0.74$0.18
PE Ratio4.733.75
PEG Ratio0.500.84
Revenue (TTM)HK$511.22B$620.10B
Gross Profit (TTM)HK$502.99B$667.93B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between 3988.HK and CICHF is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

3988.HK vs. CICHF - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 3988.HK having a 29.53% return and CICHF slightly higher at 30.96%. Over the past 10 years, 3988.HK has underperformed CICHF with an annualized return of 8.07%, while CICHF has yielded a comparatively higher 20.95% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
136.84%
1,316.30%
3988.HK
CICHF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Bank of China Limited

China Construction Bank Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3988.HK vs. CICHF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) and China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3988.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 3988.HK, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 3988.HK, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 3988.HK, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 3988.HK, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.70
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 3988.HK, currently valued at 4.60, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.004.60
CICHF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.51
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.81
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CICHF, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.14

3988.HK vs. CICHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3988.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the CICHF Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of 3988.HK and CICHF.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.45
0.51
3988.HK
CICHF

Dividends

3988.HK vs. CICHF - Dividend Comparison

3988.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, less than CICHF's 6.97% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
3988.HK
Bank of China Limited
6.53%8.45%9.12%8.46%7.90%6.33%6.26%5.01%6.02%6.86%5.65%6.15%
CICHF
China Construction Bank Corporation
6.97%9.13%8.41%7.09%6.26%5.16%47.17%4.46%5.56%7.07%6.00%35.92%

Drawdowns

3988.HK vs. CICHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3988.HK drawdown since its inception was -66.11%, smaller than the maximum CICHF drawdown of -90.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3988.HK and CICHF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.26%
0
3988.HK
CICHF

Volatility

3988.HK vs. CICHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) is 8.57%, while China Construction Bank Corporation (CICHF) has a volatility of 14.27%. This indicates that 3988.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CICHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.57%
14.27%
3988.HK
CICHF

Financials

3988.HK vs. CICHF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of China Limited and China Construction Bank Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. 3988.HK values in HKD, CICHF values in USD