PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
36BE.DE vs. IS3N.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

36BE.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Dist (36BE.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 36BE.DE achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return.


36BE.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.37%
6M
0.78%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
1.56%
10Y*

IS3N.DE

1D
-1.45%
1M
3.11%
YTD
25.82%
6M
26.34%
1Y
45.77%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

36BE.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
36BE.DE
iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Dist
1.37%-4.25%7.93%4.49%-9.70%7.28%-3.86%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
25.82%17.14%13.87%7.20%-14.09%7.38%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between 36BE.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2020

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

36BE.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

36BE.DE
36BE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
36BE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36BE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
36BE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
36BE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
36BE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

36BE.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Dist (36BE.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


36BE.DEIS3N.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.49

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

4.42

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

16.00

-13.51

36BE.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 36BE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 36BE.DE and IS3N.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


36BE.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

2.69

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.53

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.44

-0.40

Drawdowns

36BE.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 36BE.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.76%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36BE.DE and IS3N.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


36BE.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.76%

-35.06%

+22.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-10.52%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.21%

-19.17%

+7.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.76%

-22.01%

+9.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-2.49%

-3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-9.30%

+3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

2.91%

-1.62%

Volatility

36BE.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Dist (36BE.DE) is 0.99%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that 36BE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


36BE.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

7.16%

-6.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.90%

14.69%

-10.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.65%

17.32%

-11.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.11%

16.19%

-8.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.79%

18.04%

-9.25%

36BE.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

36BE.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

36BE.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison

36BE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, while IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
36BE.DE
iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Dist
4.92%4.92%4.68%4.24%2.85%2.47%1.43%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


36BE.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 36BE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

36BE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

36BE.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. 36BE.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate Sustainable SRI, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 36BE.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 36BE.DE and IS3N.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer