TRDL.DE vs. CEMF.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Treasury Bond 10+ Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRDL.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE).

TRDL.DE and CEMF.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TRDL.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Long Treasury. It was launched on Oct 12, 2022. CEMF.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. It was launched on Mar 28, 2024. Both TRDL.DE and CEMF.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

TRDL.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 10+ Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRDL.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TRDL.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TRDL.DE Invesco US Treasury Bond 10+ Year UCITS ETF Dist	1.07%	1.03%
CEMF.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc	-0.73%	2.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRDL.DE achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly higher than CEMF.DE's -0.73% return.

TRDL.DE

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -2.32%
• YTD: 1.07%
• 6M: 0.30%
• 1Y: -7.77%
• 3Y*: -4.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEMF.DE

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: -0.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRDL.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRDL.DE has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMF.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

CEMF.DE

iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc

TRDL.DE

Invesco US Treasury Bond 10+ Year UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

TRDL.DE vs. CEMF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRDL.DE

TRDL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3
TRDL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
TRDL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TRDL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TRDL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
TRDL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRDL.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 10+ Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRDL.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRDL.DE	CEMF.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.75	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.78	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRDL.DE	CEMF.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.28	0.62	-0.90

Correlation

The correlation between TRDL.DE and CEMF.DE is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TRDL.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Dividend Comparison

TRDL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, while CEMF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TRDL.DE Invesco US Treasury Bond 10+ Year UCITS ETF Dist	4.13%	4.26%	4.36%	2.87%	0.51%
CEMF.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TRDL.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRDL.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.20%, which is greater than CEMF.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRDL.DE and CEMF.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRDL.DE	CEMF.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.20%	-3.14%	-18.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.08%	-2.29%	-13.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.50%	-0.81%	-10.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.97%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRDL.DE	CEMF.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.34%	4.42%	+7.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.36%	4.42%	+8.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.36%	4.42%	+8.94%