PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3328.HK vs. 3988.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

3328.HK vs. 3988.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Bank of Communications Co Ltd (3328.HK) and Bank of China Limited (3988.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3328.HK achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly lower than 3988.HK's 17.71% return. Over the past 10 years, 3328.HK has outperformed 3988.HK with an annualized return of 16.78%, while 3988.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 12.68% annualized return.


3328.HK

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.80%
YTD
14.26%
6M
5.07%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
16.78%

3988.HK

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.94%
YTD
17.71%
6M
15.38%
1Y
16.90%
3Y*
29.10%
5Y*
20.60%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3328.HK vs. 3988.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
3328.HK
Bank of Communications Co Ltd
14.26%10.58%40.53%17.69%3.26%23.91%-20.60%-4.33%75.76%9.14%
3988.HK
Bank of China Limited
17.71%22.65%43.37%14.21%10.25%14.66%-14.78%4.69%-6.88%17.45%

Correlation

The correlation between 3328.HK and 3988.HK is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2006

0.77

The correlation between 3328.HK and 3988.HK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3328.HK vs. 3988.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3328.HK
3328.HK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
3328.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3328.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
3328.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
3328.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
3328.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

3988.HK
3988.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
3988.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3988.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
3988.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
3988.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
3988.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3328.HK vs. 3988.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of Communications Co Ltd (3328.HK) and Bank of China Limited (3988.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3328.HK3988.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.18

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

1.42

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

3.56

-2.46

3328.HK vs. 3988.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3328.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the 3988.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3328.HK and 3988.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3328.HK3988.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

1.06

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

1.14

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.69

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.32

+0.08

Drawdowns

3328.HK vs. 3988.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3328.HK drawdown since its inception was -75.23%, which is greater than 3988.HK's maximum drawdown of -66.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3328.HK and 3988.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3328.HK3988.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.23%

-66.11%

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.44%

-12.61%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.28%

-13.24%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.35%

-17.25%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.95%

-40.56%

+0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-1.13%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.77%

-19.78%

-5.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.74%

4.96%

+2.78%

Volatility

3328.HK vs. 3988.HK - Volatility Comparison

Bank of Communications Co Ltd (3328.HK) and Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) have volatilities of 4.86% and 4.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3328.HK3988.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

4.67%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

12.16%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.77%

16.88%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.70%

18.64%

+3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.75%

18.95%

+8.80%

Dividends

3328.HK vs. 3988.HK - Dividend Comparison

3328.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than 3988.HK's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
3328.HK
Bank of Communications Co Ltd
2.35%9.04%6.36%8.37%9.27%8.08%8.41%6.15%42.31%5.37%5.57%6.27%
3988.HK
Bank of China Limited
2.29%8.56%6.53%8.45%9.12%8.46%7.90%6.33%6.26%5.01%6.02%6.86%

Financials

3328.HK vs. 3988.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of Communications Co Ltd and Bank of China Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


3328.HK and 3988.HK have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3328.HK and 3988.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer