3199.HK vs. EINC
3199.HK (ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 3199.HK is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 3199.HK returned 2.92%/yr vs 11.55%/yr for EINC. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3199.HK charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
3199.HK vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3199.HK is traded in HKD, while EINC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EINC values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3199.HK achieves a 5.99% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 26.32% return. Over the past 10 years, 3199.HK has underperformed EINC with an annualized return of 2.92%, while EINC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.
3199.HK
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 5.99%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 7.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.88%
- 10Y*
- 2.92%
EINC
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 26.32%
- 6M
- 24.33%
- 1Y
- 27.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.31%
- 5Y*
- 21.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
3199.HK vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3199.HK ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF | 5.99% | 5.50% | 3.24% | 2.30% | -6.26% | 7.36% | 10.59% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 6.18% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 26.32% | 7.32% | 42.05% | 15.54% | 19.38% | 38.80% | -20.25% | 16.36% | -19.67% | -2.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3199.HK and EINC is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2014 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3199.HK vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
3199.HK
EINC
3199.HK vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3199.HK | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.39 | 3.49 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.10 | 9.51 | +3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3199.HK | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.87 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 1.08 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.46 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.04 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
3199.HK vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3199.HK drawdown since its inception was -11.05%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3199.HK and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3199.HK | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.05% | -87.53% | +76.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.60% | -7.94% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.84% | -16.16% | +12.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.05% | -19.84% | +8.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.05% | -68.83% | +57.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -4.87% | +4.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -44.04% | +40.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 2.90% | -2.27% |
Volatility
3199.HK vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF (3199.HK) is 1.54%, while VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that 3199.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3199.HK | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 6.07% | -4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.83% | 11.57% | -7.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.06% | 14.77% | -9.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 19.58% | -13.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 25.40% | -19.69% |
3199.HK vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
3199.HK has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
3199.HK vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
3199.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than EINC's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3199.HK ICBC CSOP FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond Index ETF | 3.31% | 3.34% | 3.43% | 3.51% | 3.65% | 3.40% | 3.29% | 3.57% | 3.62% | 3.39% | 3.56% | 3.69% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.53% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
3199.HK and EINC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for 3199.HK.
3199.HK is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while EINC is Energy Equities. 3199.HK tracks FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: CSOP and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for 3199.HK and 0.45% for EINC.
Find the right allocation for 3199.HK and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer