3119.HK vs. 2807.HK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

3119.HK (Global X Asia Semiconductor ETF) and 2807.HK (Global X China Robotics and AI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 3119.HK is a Semiconductors fund tracking the FactSet Asia Semiconductor Index, while 2807.HK is a Robotics fund tracking the FactSet China Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3119.HK returned 57.88%/yr vs 7.71%/yr for 2807.HK. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.

Performance

3119.HK vs. 2807.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Global X Asia Semiconductor ETF (3119.HK) and Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3119.HK achieves a 100.57% return, which is significantly higher than 2807.HK's 10.81% return.

3119.HK

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: 28.53%
• YTD: 100.57%
• 6M: 110.91%
• 1Y: 203.30%
• 3Y*: 57.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

2807.HK

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 15.60%
• 1Y: 38.43%
• 3Y*: 7.71%
• 5Y*: 0.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3119.HK vs. 2807.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
3119.HK Global X Asia Semiconductor ETF	100.57%	65.86%	6.88%	34.78%	-38.81%	6.84%
2807.HK Global X China Robotics and AI ETF	10.81%	23.46%	5.68%	1.71%	-33.54%	-1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between 3119.HK and 2807.HK is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021	0.50

The correlation between 3119.HK and 2807.HK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

3119.HK vs. 2807.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3119.HK

3119.HK Risk / Return Rank: 97
3119.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
3119.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
3119.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 96
3119.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
3119.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 97

2807.HK

2807.HK Risk / Return Rank: 38
2807.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
2807.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
2807.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 36
2807.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
2807.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3119.HK vs. 2807.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Asia Semiconductor ETF (3119.HK) and Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	3119.HK	2807.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.70	1.42	+4.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.52	1.99	+3.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	1.23	+0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.95	1.92	+8.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	40.77	4.47	+36.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

3119.HK vs. 2807.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3119.HK Sharpe Ratio is 5.70, which is higher than the 2807.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3119.HK and 2807.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3119.HK	2807.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.70	1.42	+4.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.08	+0.88

Drawdowns

3119.HK vs. 2807.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3119.HK drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, smaller than the maximum 2807.HK drawdown of -51.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3119.HK and 2807.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	3119.HK	2807.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.34%	-51.88%	+6.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.26%	-21.31%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.59%	-36.43%	+11.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-49.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.86%	-11.63%	+9.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.83%	-26.87%	+11.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.13%	9.07%	-3.94%

Volatility

3119.HK vs. 2807.HK - Volatility Comparison

Global X Asia Semiconductor ETF (3119.HK) has a higher volatility of 12.62% compared to Global X China Robotics and AI ETF (2807.HK) at 8.55%. This indicates that 3119.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2807.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3119.HK	2807.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.62%	8.55%	+4.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.96%	20.63%	+11.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.13%	28.89%	+8.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.96%	32.63%	-3.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.96%	32.73%	-3.77%

3119.HK vs. 2807.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3119.HK and 2807.HK have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

Dividends

3119.HK vs. 2807.HK - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3119.HK nor 2807.HK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3119.HK and 2807.HK in my portfolio?

3119.HK and 2807.HK have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3119.HK or 2807.HK?

Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3119.HK or 2807.HK?

3119.HK and 2807.HK have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

What is the main difference between 3119.HK and 2807.HK?

3119.HK is categorized as Semiconductors, while 2807.HK is Robotics. 3119.HK tracks FactSet Asia Semiconductor Index, while 2807.HK tracks FactSet China Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index.