PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2NFL.L vs. COII.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2NFL.L vs. COII.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2NFL.L achieves a -29.19% return, which is significantly higher than COII.L's -44.56% return.


2NFL.L

1D
1.94%
1M
-12.87%
YTD
-29.19%
6M
-41.74%
1Y
-63.34%
3Y*
27.31%
5Y*
-6.44%
10Y*

COII.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
-12.47%
YTD
-44.56%
6M
-52.15%
1Y
-65.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2NFL.L vs. COII.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
2NFL.L
Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP
-29.19%-20.02%68.09%
COII.L
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP
-44.56%-47.27%15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between 2NFL.L and COII.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2NFL.L vs. COII.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2NFL.L
2NFL.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
2NFL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

COII.L
COII.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
COII.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COII.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
COII.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
COII.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COII.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2NFL.L vs. COII.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2NFL.LCOII.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.77

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

-0.88

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

-1.34

-0.09

2NFL.L vs. COII.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2NFL.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is comparable to the COII.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2NFL.L and COII.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2NFL.LCOII.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

-1.09

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

-0.81

+0.85

Drawdowns

2NFL.L vs. COII.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2NFL.L drawdown since its inception was -95.91%, which is greater than COII.L's maximum drawdown of -76.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2NFL.L and COII.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2NFL.LCOII.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.91%

-76.00%

-19.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.00%

-74.77%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.58%

-75.01%

+7.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.90%

-34.14%

-14.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.23%

49.16%

-4.93%

Volatility

2NFL.L vs. COII.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) is 15.28%, while IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) has a volatility of 16.24%. This indicates that 2NFL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COII.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2NFL.LCOII.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.28%

16.24%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.18%

41.47%

+10.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.53%

60.26%

+4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.01%

58.71%

+32.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.95%

58.71%

+27.24%

2NFL.L vs. COII.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

2NFL.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COII.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

2NFL.L vs. COII.L - Dividend Comparison

2NFL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COII.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.73%.


PositionTTM20252024
2NFL.L
Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%
COII.L
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP
105.73%191.72%18.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


2NFL.L and COII.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COII.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COII.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2NFL.L.

2NFL.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while COII.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 2NFL.L and 0.55% for COII.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2NFL.L and COII.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer