PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2GOO.L vs. 3MSF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2GOO.L vs. 3MSF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP (2GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2GOO.L achieves a 28.19% return, which is significantly higher than 3MSF.L's -43.87% return.


2GOO.L

1D
6.74%
1M
-9.16%
YTD
28.19%
6M
23.76%
1Y
309.66%
3Y*
66.60%
5Y*
34.18%
10Y*

3MSF.L

1D
2.31%
1M
11.27%
YTD
-43.87%
6M
-42.12%
1Y
-43.56%
3Y*
-9.61%
5Y*
1.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2GOO.L vs. 3MSF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
2GOO.L
Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP
28.19%100.64%64.47%106.54%-66.92%166.13%31.17%
3MSF.L
Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP
-43.87%-1.14%15.47%170.19%-74.05%203.49%36.73%

Correlation

The correlation between 2GOO.L and 3MSF.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between 2GOO.L and 3MSF.L has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2GOO.L vs. 3MSF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2GOO.L
2GOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
2GOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

3MSF.L
3MSF.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
3MSF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3MSF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
3MSF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
3MSF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
3MSF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2GOO.L vs. 3MSF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP (2GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2GOO.L3MSF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

0.96

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.61

-0.55

+9.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.76

-0.91

+29.67

2GOO.L vs. 3MSF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2GOO.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.57, which is higher than the 3MSF.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2GOO.L and 3MSF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2GOO.L3MSF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.57

-0.49

+6.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.02

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.14

+0.71

Drawdowns

2GOO.L vs. 3MSF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2GOO.L drawdown since its inception was -69.73%, smaller than the maximum 3MSF.L drawdown of -81.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2GOO.L and 3MSF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2GOO.L3MSF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.73%

-81.42%

+11.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.69%

-79.39%

+43.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.24%

-79.39%

+26.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.73%

-81.42%

+11.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.61%

-68.07%

+52.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.97%

-36.12%

+11.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.71%

47.82%

-37.11%

Volatility

2GOO.L vs. 3MSF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP (2GOO.L) is 15.17%, while Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP GBP (3MSF.L) has a volatility of 31.04%. This indicates that 2GOO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3MSF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2GOO.L3MSF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.17%

31.04%

-15.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.51%

75.10%

-39.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.17%

88.44%

-33.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.11%

80.48%

-21.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.82%

80.21%

-18.39%

2GOO.L vs. 3MSF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2GOO.L and 3MSF.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

2GOO.L vs. 3MSF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2GOO.L nor 3MSF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2GOO.L and 3MSF.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2GOO.L and 3MSF.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

2GOO.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x GOOG Index, while 3MSF.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2GOO.L and 3MSF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer