PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP (2GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2GOO.L is traded in GBp, while 3GOE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3GOE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2GOO.L achieves a 28.19% return, which is significantly lower than 3GOE.L's 37.96% return.


2GOO.L

1D
6.74%
1M
-9.16%
YTD
28.19%
6M
23.76%
1Y
309.66%
3Y*
66.60%
5Y*
34.18%
10Y*

3GOE.L

1D
10.59%
1M
-14.47%
YTD
37.96%
6M
28.99%
1Y
603.82%
3Y*
81.01%
5Y*
30.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
2GOO.L
Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP
28.19%100.64%64.47%106.54%-66.92%166.13%31.17%
3GOE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs
37.96%117.01%92.46%146.89%-84.96%324.04%29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between 2GOO.L and 3GOE.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.94

The correlation between 2GOO.L and 3GOE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2GOO.L
2GOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
2GOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
2GOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

3GOE.L
3GOE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP (2GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2GOO.L3GOE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.58

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.61

12.14

-3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.76

37.54

-8.78

2GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2GOO.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.57, which is comparable to the 3GOE.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2GOO.L and 3GOE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2GOO.L3GOE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.57

6.92

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.34

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.57

+0.27

Drawdowns

2GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2GOO.L drawdown since its inception was -69.73%, smaller than the maximum 3GOE.L drawdown of -87.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2GOO.L and 3GOE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2GOO.L3GOE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.73%

-87.19%

+17.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.69%

-49.28%

+13.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.24%

-70.65%

+17.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.73%

-87.19%

+17.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.61%

-22.68%

+7.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.97%

-42.10%

+17.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.71%

15.97%

-5.26%

Volatility

2GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2x Alphabet ETC A GBP (2GOO.L) is 15.17%, while Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETP Scs (3GOE.L) has a volatility of 23.75%. This indicates that 2GOO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3GOE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2GOO.L3GOE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.17%

23.75%

-8.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.51%

54.00%

-18.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.17%

86.54%

-31.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.11%

88.96%

-29.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.82%

88.57%

-26.75%

2GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2GOO.L and 3GOE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

2GOO.L vs. 3GOE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2GOO.L nor 3GOE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, 2GOO.L and 3GOE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2GOO.L and 3GOE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

2GOO.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x GOOG Index, while 3GOE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2GOO.L and 3GOE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer