2GB.DE vs. TSLR
2GB.DE (2G Energy AG) is a stock, while TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Over the past year, 2GB.DE returned 113.57% vs 38.63% for TSLR. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
2GB.DE vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2GB.DE achieves a 94.05% return, which is significantly higher than TSLR's -32.42% return.
2GB.DE
- 1D
- -7.56%
- 1M
- 22.32%
- YTD
- 94.05%
- 6M
- 97.69%
- 1Y
- 113.57%
- 3Y*
- 33.57%
- 5Y*
- 25.28%
- 10Y*
- 31.83%
TSLR
- 1D
- -13.30%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- -32.42%
- 6M
- -35.09%
- 1Y
- 38.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2GB.DE vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2GB.DE 2G Energy AG | 94.05% | 54.56% | 2.05% | 0.67% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -32.42% | -25.97% | 67.57% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2GB.DE and TSLR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2GB.DE vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank
2GB.DE
TSLR
2GB.DE vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2G Energy AG (2GB.DE) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2GB.DE | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.14 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 0.71 | +2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.75 | 1.49 | +8.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2GB.DE | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 0.44 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | -0.05 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
2GB.DE vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2GB.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, smaller than the maximum TSLR drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2GB.DE and TSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2GB.DE | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.62% | -82.80% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.17% | -54.37% | +19.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.56% | -65.41% | +57.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.33% | -50.28% | +22.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.19% | 26.06% | -13.87% |
Volatility
2GB.DE vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 2G Energy AG (2GB.DE) is 26.68%, while GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a volatility of 28.24%. This indicates that 2GB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2GB.DE | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.68% | 28.24% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.80% | 55.89% | -15.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.38% | 93.48% | -40.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.63% | 115.68% | -72.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.24% | 115.68% | -72.44% |
Dividends
2GB.DE vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison
2GB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2GB.DE 2G Energy AG | 0.34% | 0.65% | 0.80% | 0.67% | 0.57% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 1.14% | 2.24% | 2.58% | 2.24% | 1.89% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
2GB.DE and TSLR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 2GB.DE and TSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer