PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7D.DE vs. IQQH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7D.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7D.DE achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly lower than IQQH.DE's 23.10% return.


2B7D.DE

1D
0.79%
1M
1.93%
YTD
13.13%
6M
13.99%
1Y
11.72%
3Y*
7.61%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*

IQQH.DE

1D
-2.25%
1M
-12.69%
YTD
23.10%
6M
23.40%
1Y
56.06%
3Y*
3.16%
5Y*
-1.23%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7D.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2B7D.DE
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF
13.13%-8.12%21.75%-3.80%5.44%28.07%-0.37%29.93%-4.54%-11.62%
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
23.10%29.63%-21.56%-22.41%0.55%-18.08%117.29%47.44%-4.63%0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7D.DE and IQQH.DE is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2017

0.18

The correlation between 2B7D.DE and IQQH.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7D.DE vs. IQQH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7D.DE
2B7D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
2B7D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQH.DE
IQQH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7D.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


2B7D.DEIQQH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.35

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

3.78

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.93

11.85

-8.93

2B7D.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7D.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7D.DE and IQQH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

2B7D.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7D.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.26%, smaller than the maximum IQQH.DE drawdown of -87.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7D.DE and IQQH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7D.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.26%

-87.02%

+59.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-14.78%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.57%

-43.32%

+27.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.57%

-57.98%

+42.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-42.76%

+39.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-63.52%

+55.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

4.72%

-0.73%

Volatility

2B7D.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE) is 5.07%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that 2B7D.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7D.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

9.95%

-4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.83%

20.24%

-8.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

26.05%

-11.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

25.02%

-11.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

25.15%

-9.56%

2B7D.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7D.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQH.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

2B7D.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Dividend Comparison

2B7D.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2B7D.DE
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.91%1.33%1.24%0.80%0.53%0.73%0.49%1.56%2.87%2.88%2.81%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


2B7D.DE and IQQH.DE have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 2B7D.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B7D.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

2B7D.DE is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while IQQH.DE is Energy Equities. 2B7D.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples, while IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 2B7D.DE and 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7D.DE and IQQH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer