2B7B.DE vs. ESEA.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

2B7B.DE (iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF) and ESEA.DE (BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 2B7B.DE is a Materials fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Sector Index, while ESEA.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2B7B.DE returned 5.89%/yr vs 14.54%/yr for ESEA.DE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

2B7B.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

2B7B.DE is traded in EUR, while ESEA.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ESEA.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7B.DE achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly higher than ESEA.DE's 11.32% return.

2B7B.DE

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 12.98%
• 6M: 16.62%
• 1Y: 16.36%
• 3Y*: 8.06%
• 5Y*: 5.89%
• 10Y*: —

ESEA.DE

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 4.44%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 6M: 10.93%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 18.81%
• 5Y*: 14.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7B.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
2B7B.DE iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF	12.98%	-1.07%	5.24%	8.58%	-7.10%	39.56%	8.41%	7.12%
ESEA.DE BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF	11.32%	4.18%	32.44%	22.22%	-14.52%	41.11%	7.15%	11.44%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7B.DE and ESEA.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2019	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between 2B7B.DE and ESEA.DE has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

2B7B.DE vs. ESEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7B.DE

2B7B.DE Risk / Return Rank: 30
2B7B.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
2B7B.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
2B7B.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 28
2B7B.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
2B7B.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 32

ESEA.DE

ESEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 74
ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ESEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ESEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ESEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ESEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7B.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2B7B.DE	ESEA.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	2.04	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	2.82	-1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.38	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	3.53	-1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.68	12.08	-7.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

2B7B.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7B.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7B.DE and ESEA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2B7B.DE	ESEA.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	2.04	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.90	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.88	-0.43

Drawdowns

2B7B.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7B.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, roughly equal to the maximum ESEA.DE drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7B.DE and ESEA.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	2B7B.DE	ESEA.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.61%	-33.64%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-7.19%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.54%	-22.79%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.54%	-22.79%	-1.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.44%	-0.39%	-2.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-4.87%	-1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	2.10%	+1.34%

Volatility

2B7B.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) at 3.02%. This indicates that 2B7B.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	2B7B.DE	ESEA.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	3.02%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.31%	8.65%	+3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.43%	12.45%	+2.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.20%	15.91%	+1.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.16%	17.81%	+1.35%

2B7B.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2B7B.DE and ESEA.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

2B7B.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Dividend Comparison

2B7B.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESEA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
2B7B.DE iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ESEA.DE BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF	1.06%	0.76%	0.65%	0.00%	1.08%	0.64%	0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 2B7B.DE and ESEA.DE in my portfolio?

2B7B.DE and ESEA.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 2B7B.DE or ESEA.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 2B7B.DE or ESEA.DE?

2B7B.DE and ESEA.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

What is the main difference between 2B7B.DE and ESEA.DE?

2B7B.DE is categorized as Materials, while ESEA.DE is S&P 500. 2B7B.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Sector Index, while ESEA.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNP Paribas.