2B79.DE vs. LSMC.DE
2B79.DE (iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 2B79.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Digitalisation, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2B79.DE returned 1.74%/yr vs 36.20%/yr for LSMC.DE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 2B79.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
2B79.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2B79.DE achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return.
2B79.DE
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 9.09%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- -3.45%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- —
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 63.41%
- 1Y
- 126.99%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
2B79.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B79.DE iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF | 1.48% | -6.47% | 29.11% | 28.57% | -32.56% | 8.74% | 28.52% | 29.93% | -1.19% | 12.33% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -34.66% | 37.56% | 23.03% | 39.73% | -5.73% | 12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2B79.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.62 |
The correlation between 2B79.DE and LSMC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2B79.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
2B79.DE
LSMC.DE
2B79.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF (2B79.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2B79.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.59 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 10.37 | -10.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | 32.83 | -33.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2B79.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 4.27 | -4.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 1.15 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.82 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
2B79.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B79.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.40%, roughly equal to the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B79.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2B79.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.40% | -39.77% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.05% | -12.53% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.88% | -36.22% | +8.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.40% | -39.77% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.25% | -3.34% | -9.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -9.37% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.03% | 3.96% | +6.07% |
Volatility
2B79.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Digitalisation UCITS ETF (2B79.DE) is 5.57%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that 2B79.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2B79.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 11.23% | -5.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.51% | 22.18% | -8.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 30.40% | -13.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 31.21% | -11.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 26.06% | -6.26% |
2B79.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
2B79.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
2B79.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2B79.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2B79.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 2B79.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2B79.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
2B79.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. 2B79.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Digitalisation, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 2B79.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for 2B79.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer