2B76.DE vs. ICLN
2B76.DE (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) and ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 2B76.DE is a Robotics fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2B76.DE returned 11.53%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ICLN. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 2B76.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ICLN.
Performance
2B76.DE vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
2B76.DE is traded in EUR, while ICLN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICLN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 2B76.DE having a 29.17% return and ICLN slightly higher at 29.29%.
2B76.DE
- 1D
- 3.99%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 29.17%
- 6M
- 29.54%
- 1Y
- 44.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- —
ICLN
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- 29.29%
- 6M
- 28.89%
- 1Y
- 59.96%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
2B76.DE vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B76.DE iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 29.17% | 4.50% | 12.12% | 35.00% | -31.03% | 32.23% | 26.14% | 41.93% | -15.52% | 29.41% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 29.29% | 29.60% | -20.81% | -22.79% | 0.43% | -18.51% | 121.89% | 47.62% | -4.76% | 6.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2B76.DE and ICLN is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2B76.DE vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank
2B76.DE
ICLN
2B76.DE vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 2B76.DE | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 3.91 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | 13.46 | -3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
2B76.DE vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B76.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.50%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -84.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B76.DE and ICLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2B76.DE | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.50% | -84.40% | +48.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -15.69% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.47% | -42.73% | +13.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.50% | -57.06% | +21.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -28.84% | +27.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -57.98% | +48.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 4.55% | -0.33% |
Volatility
2B76.DE vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE) is 8.78%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 12.22%. This indicates that 2B76.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2B76.DE | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.78% | 12.22% | -3.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.04% | 21.55% | -3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.53% | 27.08% | -4.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 26.01% | -4.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 26.55% | -4.13% |
2B76.DE vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
2B76.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
2B76.DE vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison
2B76.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B76.DE iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
2B76.DE and ICLN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 2B76.DE.
2B76.DE is categorized as Robotics, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. 2B76.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 2B76.DE and 0.39% for ICLN.
Find the right allocation for 2B76.DE and ICLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer