PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2AMD.L vs. SMH3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2AMD.L is traded in GBp, while SMH3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH3.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 2AMD.L having a 345.45% return and SMH3.L slightly lower at 332.35%.


2AMD.L

1D
-0.87%
1M
98.27%
YTD
345.45%
6M
330.90%
1Y
1,086.85%
3Y*
74.75%
5Y*
45.83%
10Y*

SMH3.L

1D
4.11%
1M
88.51%
YTD
332.35%
6M
329.59%
1Y
994.08%
3Y*
156.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
2AMD.L
Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP
345.45%82.40%-49.88%285.12%-86.24%12.12%
SMH3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities
332.35%62.22%69.91%243.35%-83.36%2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between 2AMD.L and SMH3.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021

0.71

The correlation between 2AMD.L and SMH3.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

2AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
2AMD.L
SMH3.L

Technology

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

2AMD.L
100.0%
SMH3.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

2AMD.L

-

SMH3.L

-

Communication Services

2AMD.L

-

SMH3.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

2AMD.L

-

SMH3.L

-

Consumer Defensive

2AMD.L

-

SMH3.L

-

Energy

2AMD.L

-

SMH3.L

-

Financial Services

2AMD.L

-

SMH3.L

-

Healthcare

2AMD.L

-

SMH3.L

-

Industrials

2AMD.L

-

SMH3.L

-

Real Estate

2AMD.L

-

SMH3.L

-

Utilities

2AMD.L

-

SMH3.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2AMD.L vs. SMH3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2AMD.L
2AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH3.L
SMH3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2AMD.LSMH3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.64

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

21.03

26.22

-5.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.31

84.20

-42.89

2AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 9.26, which is comparable to the SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio of 10.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2AMD.L and SMH3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2AMD.LSMH3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26

10.77

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.55

-0.07

Drawdowns

2AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2AMD.L drawdown since its inception was -91.38%, roughly equal to the maximum SMH3.L drawdown of -87.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2AMD.L and SMH3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2AMD.LSMH3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.38%

-87.38%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.04%

-37.52%

-17.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.49%

-84.61%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

0.00%

-4.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.54%

-47.69%

-6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.08%

11.71%

+16.37%

Volatility

2AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) has a higher volatility of 46.51% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) at 38.25%. This indicates that 2AMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2AMD.LSMH3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.51%

38.25%

+8.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.42%

69.67%

+17.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

124.99%

91.73%

+33.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.20%

99.02%

+5.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.07%

99.02%

+3.05%

2AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2AMD.L and SMH3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

2AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2AMD.L nor SMH3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2AMD.L and SMH3.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2AMD.L and SMH3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2AMD.L and SMH3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer