PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2007.HK vs. VXZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

2007.HK vs. VXZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Country Garden Holdings Company Ltd (2007.HK) and iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2007.HK is traded in HKD, while VXZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VXZ values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2007.HK achieves a -48.19% return, which is significantly lower than VXZ's 2.14% return.


2007.HK

1D
-1.83%
1M
-20.37%
YTD
-48.19%
6M
-58.65%
1Y
-44.87%
3Y*
-47.19%
5Y*
-52.49%
10Y*
-21.08%

VXZ

1D
0.79%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
2.14%
6M
-0.90%
1Y
-9.25%
3Y*
-11.21%
5Y*
-12.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2007.HK vs. VXZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
2007.HK
Country Garden Holdings Company Ltd
-48.19%-14.43%-37.82%-70.79%-60.42%-31.38%-8.47%38.50%-39.46%
VXZ
iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN
2.14%5.93%-13.10%-43.99%0.64%-15.93%71.99%-20.52%32.12%

Correlation

The correlation between 2007.HK and VXZ is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2007.HK vs. VXZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2007.HK
2007.HK Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
2007.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2007.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
2007.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
2007.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
2007.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VXZ
VXZ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2007.HK vs. VXZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Country Garden Holdings Company Ltd (2007.HK) and iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2007.HKVXZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

0.93

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

-0.61

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.18

-1.03

-0.15

2007.HK vs. VXZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2007.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the VXZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2007.HK and VXZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2007.HKVXZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

-0.49

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.72

-0.43

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

-0.08

-0.19

Drawdowns

2007.HK vs. VXZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2007.HK drawdown since its inception was -98.54%, which is greater than VXZ's maximum drawdown of -68.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2007.HK and VXZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2007.HKVXZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.54%

-68.93%

-29.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.71%

-15.24%

-54.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.82%

-39.36%

-49.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.70%

-62.38%

-35.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.50%

-64.48%

-34.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.00%

-36.68%

-26.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.77%

9.01%

+29.76%

Volatility

2007.HK vs. VXZ - Volatility Comparison

Country Garden Holdings Company Ltd (2007.HK) has a higher volatility of 22.47% compared to iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) at 3.66%. This indicates that 2007.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2007.HKVXZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.47%

3.66%

+18.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.52%

13.61%

+33.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.41%

19.16%

+46.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.88%

29.14%

+44.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.14%

34.11%

+25.03%

Dividends

2007.HK vs. VXZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2007.HK nor VXZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2007.HK
Country Garden Holdings Company Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.45%8.04%5.65%4.79%7.18%1.84%3.38%7.80%
VXZ
iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

2007.HK vs. VXZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Country Garden Holdings Company Ltd and iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 2007.HK values in HKD, VXZ values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


2007.HK and VXZ have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2007.HK and VXZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer